If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

[amat]

There is no way Bolt is going to be even close to as decorated as Phelps I'm not arguing that, and I don't buy the freestyle/butterfly stroke either because how many swimmers compete in both? Nearly all of them. How manny runners compete in both sprints and hurdles? I can't recall any and I imagine you would have to go back a bit to find someone who medaled in both. That can't be a valid comparision.

And none of Phelps margin of victories were as completely unprecedented as Bolt's who could have won by more 5 lengths if he chose to.

Well Carl Lewis won Olympic golds in both the 100 meters, 200 meters and Long Jump and then became the only man in history to defend both his 100 meters and Long Jump titles.

I don't really see any difference at all between 100 and 200 meters to be honest, the best sprinter in the world would naturally be world class over both events.

Phelps has won both 100 and 400 meter medals in this tournament plus there's much more of a difference between swimming an extra hundred meters and running it.

Besides am I alone in thinking that running is mostly a matter of genetics, I mean how much skill can there really be in running in a straight line?

At least swimming involves relatively difficult and unnatural techniques to learn, man not being adapted to the water after all.

I don't see any reason why a track and field athlete should find it any tougher to dominate multiple events than a swimmer really.

IF Carl Lewis can win both the 100 meter and 200 meter events plus the Long Jump then why not Bolt?

He hasn't done as much as Phelps, not even close imo, it just happens that the 100 meters is perhaps the most glamourous event and so gets more publicity.

Gah I hate disagreeing with you Bilbo, if you can't even acknowledge that sprinting requires some skill or isn't determined at birth then how is anything I'm writing going to mean anything? oh well

There is a ton of skill that goes in running, the same amount of skill that goes in swimming because half of the battle is just perfecting your technique. Besides, Phelps is 6'4 and has 30 inch legs with a size 15 shoe, if anyone is benefiting from genetics it is him.

How can you not see the difference between the 100 and 200? The 200m is way different just like a 1 mile and an 8th horse race is way different then a mile and a half horse race. Some people just hit their stride later. Bolt is built much better for the 200m because of how long his legs are. Usually guys with builds like that can't get going so fast which is what has been so amazing about Bolt from day 1. Bolt running 30 MPH isn't what makes him so amazing or a freak of nature, it's the fact that he can generate that speed so quickly. It's something the world has never seen before, if it was all down to genetics Bilbo then every runner in the 100 would be 6'5 and long and lanky not short and compact. What makes the 200 so interesting and so different is because you see more of a variety in body types and that's where you get an interesting mix of front runners and closers, much like horse racing. Bolt I would think is going to be untouchable in the 200 and I agree, I would like to see him run the 400 in the future.

And I don't think Bolt has ever competed in the long jump, it's a completely different sport. Jumping, running. Why doesn't Michael Phelps do synchronized diving? They both take place in water right? A lot of the American sprinters do do the long jump, Marion Jones also did the long jump but most drop it either in college or once they leave college if they make it that far in competition.