Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Is JMM the no1 Lightweight in the world?

Results 1 to 15 of 93

Thread: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1594
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.
    Why is the Ring Belt not a title. It was a real title when Jack Dempsey defended it. The World alphabet belts have only been around since 1962, before that it WAS only the Ring title that granted true World recognition.

    What constitutes a real title? Does the organization have to rob the fighters of portions of their purses for it to be real? Does the organization have to rank unjust challengers at their number one contenders for it to be real?

    If the Ring started charging sanctioning fees and ranking Gary Locket as their number 1 contender then would you recognize it as a real title?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2332
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.
    Why is the Ring Belt not a title. It was a real title when Jack Dempsey defended it. The World alphabet belts have only been around since 1962, before that it WAS only the Ring title that granted true World recognition.

    What constitutes a real title? Does the organization have to rob the fighters of portions of their purses for it to be real? Does the organization have to rank unjust challengers at their number one contenders for it to be real?

    If the Ring started charging sanctioning fees and ranking Gary Locket as their number 1 contender then would you recognize it as a real title?
    Nice one Lance. Totally agree. If Bilbo wants to follow their mess that his choice but to say the Ring championship isn't real is just not logical! It is more real than the stripped paper alphabet titles!!!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Gammer agrees new Williams date
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 11:47 PM
  2. Gammer agrees new Williams date
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 07:08 PM
  3. Mayweather Jr. AGREES TO WEAR REYES
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-28-2006, 11:16 PM
  4. Who agrees we have to see Hatton v Cotto!!
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-05-2006, 11:03 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing