pavlik isnt way overrated thats just crazy he beat the man who beat the man. how is that overrated man that just sounds like somebody being a hater
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Dazed and Confused
Array
Re: Hopkins: is 43 for Bernard too old? Or is he does he still got it?
pavlik isnt way overrated thats just crazy he beat the man who beat the man. how is that overrated man that just sounds like somebody being a hater
Forum P4P Champ
Array
Re: Hopkins: is 43 for Bernard too old? Or is he does he still got it?
OK, let's get technical cuz you may not know fighting, but styles make fights & the man who beat the man means nothing and is invalid! a very uneducated statementOriginally Posted by kingfrnk
pavlik isnt way overrated thats just crazy he beat the man who beat the man. how is that overrated man that just sounds like somebody being a hater
Dazed and Confused
Array
Re: Hopkins: is 43 for Bernard too old? Or is he does he still got it?
OK, let's get technical cuz you may not know fighting, but styles make fights & the man who beat the man means nothing and is invalid! a very uneducated statementpavlik isnt way overrated thats just crazy he beat the man who beat the man. how is that overrated man that just sounds like somebody being a hater
look i never said just because he beat jermain taylor that hes gonna beat hopkins which i think he is by the way what i said is that he beat the champ who beat the champ, now how is that being overrated why because he beat the man to beat at middleweight. your calling him overrated as if he hasnt done nothing with his career.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks