Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Hopkins: is 43 for Bernard too old? Or is he does he still got it?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins: is 43 for Bernard too old? Or is he does he still got it?

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    I think Pavlik is going to hurt Hopkins.
    Alright that seals it, Hopkins will win this fight in a big way.
    Ive been pretty good in my recent picks, I'll have you know.

    I would be surprised to see Hopkins get through this one, Hopkins usually gets crafty in the championship rounds and against Calzaghe was nowhere to be seen. His legs tire against high output fighter much quicker so he is less effective later on. I can see Pavlik wearing Hopkins down with the chase and begin to put on some hurt, or Hopkins will try and bide time again.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,047
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins: is 43 for Bernard too old? Or is he does he still got it?

    I am steawing and all mixed up on this one.Almost like looking at a hot stove and being so tempted to touch it.....but knowing I'll get burned ??

    Hopkins must take risks and capitilize on his sharpshooting.Life long fan but he can not ride his legacy right now.Imo,He has every possibility of frustrating and taking Pavlik very deep down the stretch,Shite,he frustrates me just watching him sometimes .

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2582
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Hopkins: is 43 for Bernard too old? Or is he does he still got it?

    Quote Originally Posted by NorthSideX4 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    pavlik isnt way overrated thats just crazy he beat the man who beat the man. how is that overrated man that just sounds like somebody being a hater
    OK, let's get technical cuz you may not know fighting, but styles make fights & the man who beat the man means nothing and is invalid! a very uneducated statement

    look i never said just because he beat jermain taylor that hes gonna beat hopkins which i think he is by the way what i said is that he beat the champ who beat the champ, now how is that being overrated why because he beat the man to beat at middleweight. your calling him overrated as if he hasnt done nothing with his career.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. beyond the glory: Bernard hopkins
    By Pugilistic in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-25-2007, 12:03 AM
  2. Q&A: Bernard Hopkins!
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-29-2006, 01:56 AM
  3. bernard hopkins
    By NUCLEAR BULL in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-02-2006, 04:53 PM
  4. Bernard Hopkins Legacy
    By Bookkeeper in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-08-2006, 07:03 AM
  5. Bernard Hopkins speaks
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-25-2006, 09:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing