What is with this site and Kelly Pavlik

[Spicoli]

Undercard of Pavlik/Hopkins.......it's stacked.Ornelos vs. Rubio good scrap........Mares vs.Melendez....Nice......Steve Luevano vs. Dib....even showing punch from the backseat Yuri Foreman

[C-Lo]

From reading all the posts about Pavlik...

...he's 26, he's showing a lot of potential and fighting anyone they throw in front of him. It's not hard to get excited on what he can possibly do with the rest of his career.

There was a post about him fighting the best middleweights of all-time on here. C'mon, he's way too young to be talking about that. His career is just beginning and we should all just sit back and enjoy the ride...

[kingfrnk]

From reading all the posts about Pavlik...

...he's 26, he's showing a lot of potential and fighting anyone they throw in front of him. It's not hard to get excited on what he can possibly do with the rest of his career.

There was a post about him fighting the best middleweights of all-time on here. C'mon, he's way too young to be talking about that. His career is just beginning and we should all just sit back and enjoy the ride...

i told taeths gay ass that. all he says i who has kelly fought. the stupid retard must want kelly to fight once a month or somethin. Taeth this aint the fukin old days.

[intoccabile]

Considering Miranda and Taylor both suffer from the same flaw of dropping their front hand low, I'd say Pavlik was at the right place at the right time.

He's a good 1-2 puncher, just the perfect style to take advantage of dropped hands. Winky showed just how effective straights are against a bad guard when he fought Taylor first. Taylor and Miranda were tailor made for Pavlik, imo and both have always looked god awful in my eyes. It's hard to give Pavlik credit for his biggest wins when they were tailor made and had very green tendencies.

Pavliks good though, and young. He claims he only wants what, 5 more bouts? At his age he's got about 8 years left to cement an incredible legacy assuming he stays healthy. I like him because I think he is very good for boxing, nothing more.

[Bomp]

From reading all the posts about Pavlik...

...he's 26, he's showing a lot of potential and fighting anyone they throw in front of him. It's not hard to get excited on what he can possibly do with the rest of his career.

There was a post about him fighting the best middleweights of all-time on here. C'mon, he's way too young to be talking about that. His career is just beginning and we should all just sit back and enjoy the ride...

i told taeths gay ass that. all he says i who has kelly fought. the stupid retard must want kelly to fight once a month or somethin. Taeth this aint the fukin old days.

The point Taeth makes is the SAME as Caleoh's, just to counter the stuff like that thread where guys said he'd beat all the legends like SRR. He is promising and exciting but that talk is ridicilously premature.

[Taeth]

From reading all the posts about Pavlik...

...he's 26, he's showing a lot of potential and fighting anyone they throw in front of him. It's not hard to get excited on what he can possibly do with the rest of his career.

There was a post about him fighting the best middleweights of all-time on here. C'mon, he's way too young to be talking about that. His career is just beginning and we should all just sit back and enjoy the ride...

i told taeths gay ass that. all he says i who has kelly fought. the stupid retard must want kelly to fight once a month or somethin. Taeth this aint the fukin old days.

STFU, you've been on here two months, and you know nothing about boxing. What I am saying is that you can't overrate a fighter, yet. I am saying who has Kelly fought YET. If he does go on to beat Hopkins, Calzaghe, etc. then I will give him the credit, but as of YET he hasn't done it. As for me being stupid, I am not the one who can't put a coherent sentence together.

Coherent means understandable just incase you don't know what it means dumbass

I don't know, I still don't see the same promise some people do. He could become really good, and he already is, but his potential has a lower pinnacle then some of the other guys out there.

[kingfrnk]

From reading all the posts about Pavlik...

...he's 26, he's showing a lot of potential and fighting anyone they throw in front of him. It's not hard to get excited on what he can possibly do with the rest of his career.

There was a post about him fighting the best middleweights of all-time on here. C'mon, he's way too young to be talking about that. His career is just beginning and we should all just sit back and enjoy the ride...

i told taeths gay ass that. all he says i who has kelly fought. the stupid retard must want kelly to fight once a month or somethin. Taeth this aint the fukin old days.

STFU, you've been on here two months, and you know nothing about boxing. What I am saying is that you can't overrate a fighter, yet. I am saying who has Kelly fought YET. If he does go on to beat Hopkins, Calzaghe, etc. then I will give him the credit, but as of YET he hasn't done it. As for me being stupid, I am not the one who can't put a coherent sentence together.

Coherent means understandable just incase you don't know what it means dumbass

I don't know, I still don't see the same promise some people do. He could become really good, and he already is, but his potential has a lower pinnacle then some of the other guys out there.

oh and u know everything,oh and ur next post will probably say "i know more than you" and so the fuk wat. and u wanna talk about me putting together a COHERENT sentence let me look around for a bit. oh yea its the fukin internet dumbass. im not gonna get a grade on posts u LOSER.

[Spicoli]

i told taeths gay ass that. all he says i who has kelly fought. the stupid retard must want kelly to fight once a month or somethin. Taeth this aint the fukin old days.

STFU, you've been on here two months, and you know nothing about boxing. What I am saying is that you can't overrate a fighter, yet. I am saying who has Kelly fought YET. If he does go on to beat Hopkins, Calzaghe, etc. then I will give him the credit, but as of YET he hasn't done it. As for me being stupid, I am not the one who can't put a coherent sentence together.

Coherent means understandable just incase you don't know what it means dumbass

I don't know, I still don't see the same promise some people do. He could become really good, and he already is, but his potential has a lower pinnacle then some of the other guys out there.

oh and u know everything,oh and ur next post will probably say "i know more than you" and so the fuk wat. and u wanna talk about me putting together a COHERENT sentence let me look around for a bit. oh yea its the fukin internet dumbass. im not gonna get a grade on posts u LOSER.

Actually Frank fellow members tend to judge & form opinions on some by their post's.I'm not sure but mainly on the front board here....the substance,debate,etc pro & con. ??