Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 63

Thread: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1369
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    I still rank Jones higher than those guys. IMO Jones is still a top 15 ATG.

    I think you that rate Joe over RJJ are fucking crazy. So victories over Lacy, Kessler, a razor thin victory over Hopkins and a win over the shell of Roy equal winning titles everywhere from MIDDLEWEIGHT to HEAVYWEIGHT?!? You have to be out of you g'damn mind. People say Roy's compedition was bad. Calzaghe's was better? Bull sh#t.
    Last edited by Beanflicker; 11-09-2008 at 01:13 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    I still rank Jones higher than those guys. IMO Jones is still a top 15 ATG.

    I think you that rate Joe over RJJ are fucking crazy. So victories over Lacy, Kessler, a razor thin victory over Hopkins and a win over the shell of Roy equal winning titles everywhere from MIDDLEWEIGHT to HEAVYWEIGHT?!? You have to be out of you g'damn mind. People say Roy's compedition was bad. Calzaghe's was better? Bull sh#t.
    Please. Arguing whether Roys competition is better than Joes competition is like arguing if dog sh!t tastes better than bull sh!t, they both suck. Also, calling Roy heavyweight champion because he beat Ruiz would be like calling DLH middleweight champion because he beat Sturm. The real middleweight champ was Hopkins. The real heavyweight champ was Lennox. All those guys did was pick up trinckets, not titles.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2482
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Jones
    Hopkins
    Toney
    who was the other guy ?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Jones
    Hopkins
    Toney
    who was the other guy ?
    hahaha.. wow

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    ...I can't see why anyone would think more of Calzaghe than they do of Wladimir Klitschko. If Wlad crushed Evander Holyfield that would be about the same as Joe beating Roy last night.

    Joe Calzaghe never really had a prime competitor to push him to his limit and test him. I guess Mikkel Kessler or Robin Reid are the closest he got but Jones, Eubank, and Hopkins are of another era.



    1. Roy
    2. Toney
    3. Hopkins
    4. Calzaghe

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1219
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Jones
    Hopkins
    Toney
    who was the other guy ?
    LOL

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1369
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Saying Jones' compedition was shit is unfair, because he did beat a lot of solid opposition. Sugar Boy Malinga, Merqui Sosa, Griffen, these guys were solid opposition but because their names aren't "Marvin Hagler" or "Stanley Ketchel", and because Jones iced them so easily, people just assume they were bums.

    And ok, John Ruiz is not going to go down as one of the best HWs of all time, but he was a good, 240lb fighter. LIke him or not, he did beat a lot of other top HWs of the time like Rahman, Holyfield, Golota and Oquendo. Ruiz is no pushover.

    Lets put it this way, how would you fancy Calzaghe's chances of moving up to cruiserweight for one fight and taking one of the "trinkets" there? Would you pick him to beat a Steve Cunningham or Tomasz Adamek? I sure as hell wouldn't, and it would be an incredible accomplishment if he were to do it, so don't try to downplay Jones' accomplishment.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Saying Jones' compedition was shit is unfair, because he did beat a lot of solid opposition. Sugar Boy Malinga, Merqui Sosa, Griffen, these guys were solid opposition but because their names aren't "Marvin Hagler" or "Stanley Ketchel", and because Jones iced them so easily, people just assume they were bums.

    And ok, John Ruiz is not going to go down as one of the best HWs of all time, but he was a good, 240lb fighter. LIke him or not, he did beat a lot of other top HWs of the time like Rahman, Holyfield, Golota and Oquendo. Ruiz is no pushover.

    Lets put it this way, how would you fancy Calzaghe's chances of moving up to cruiserweight for one fight and taking one of the "trinkets" there? Would you pick him to beat a Steve Cunningham or Tomasz Adamek? I sure as hell wouldn't, and it would be an incredible accomplishment if he were to do it, so don't try to downplay Jones' accomplishment.
    Actually, I will downplay Roy's accomplishment, because his 'accomplishments' are the only thing preventing me from ranking him #1. Accomplishments are not what 'would' someone do, it's what 'did' someone do. It's like saying how would Jack Dempsey do if he fought Tony Tucker, (he'd probably lose), however Dempsey ranks higher because of what he 'did.' No one's saying Roy's competition is sh!t, we're saying both he and Joe's level of competition is far below B-Hop's, and therefore it's frivolous to compare two things that are subpar to begin with. Also, since when did we start giving ATG's credit for beating people who merely 'aren't pushovers?' I thought the whole point of this was pointing out career highlights, not career fillers.

  9. #9
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Ray Robinson lost to Carmen Basilio....doesn't mean Carmen is rated higher all-time than him though

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Ray Robinson lost to Carmen Basilio....doesn't mean Carmen is rated higher all-time than him though
    thank you

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1369
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Quote Originally Posted by match View Post

    Actually, I will downplay Roy's accomplishment, because his 'accomplishments' are the only thing preventing me from ranking him #1. Accomplishments are not what 'would' someone do, it's what 'did' someone do. It's like saying how would Jack Dempsey do if he fought Tony Tucker, (he'd probably lose), however Dempsey ranks higher because of what he 'did.' No one's saying Roy's competition is sh!t, we're saying both he and Joe's level of competition is far below B-Hop's, and therefore it's frivolous to compare two things that are subpar to begin with. Also, since when did we start giving ATG's credit for beating people who merely 'aren't pushovers?' I thought the whole point of this was pointing out career highlights, not career fillers.
    Where in my post did I say I give credit to people for something they haven't done? You need to work on your reading comprehension.

    I said Ruiz was no pushover AT HEAVYWEIGHT. So for someone to come up 2 weight divisions and and beat a SOLID fighter 40-50lbs bigger than him is absolutely incredible. If you can't see that then you have absolutely NO boxing knowledge whatsoever.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by match View Post

    Actually, I will downplay Roy's accomplishment, because his 'accomplishments' are the only thing preventing me from ranking him #1. Accomplishments are not what 'would' someone do, it's what 'did' someone do. It's like saying how would Jack Dempsey do if he fought Tony Tucker, (he'd probably lose), however Dempsey ranks higher because of what he 'did.' No one's saying Roy's competition is sh!t, we're saying both he and Joe's level of competition is far below B-Hop's, and therefore it's frivolous to compare two things that are subpar to begin with. Also, since when did we start giving ATG's credit for beating people who merely 'aren't pushovers?' I thought the whole point of this was pointing out career highlights, not career fillers.
    Where in my post did I say I give credit to people for something they haven't done? You need to work on your reading comprehension.

    I said Ruiz was no pushover AT HEAVYWEIGHT. So for someone to come up 2 weight divisions and and beat a SOLID fighter 40-50lbs bigger than him is absolutely incredible. If you can't see that then you have absolutely NO boxing knowledge whatsoever.
    Actually, you're the one who should get hooked on phonics. You just asked 'How would Calzaghe have done if he would have fought.....' And instead of trying to hurl immature insults at someone for merely disagreeing with you, ask yourself why NO ONE brings up Leonard's win over Donny Lalonde when speaking of his accomplishments. Because to most, it really doesn't matter how high you move up if you aren't willing to do so to face a great fighter.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-19-2008, 02:23 PM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-22-2008, 02:37 AM
  3. Hopkins v Calzaghe.... Hopkins speaks
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-20-2006, 04:47 AM
  4. How Can Anyone Now Rank Hopkins Lower than Roy Jones?
    By smashcrusher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 06-13-2006, 06:05 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-08-2006, 11:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing