Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1498
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Didn't we just do this 2 weeks ago? Or right after Hopkins beat Pavlik. The consensus is that Bernard is NOT in his prime its ridiculous to say. Also look at who he has just beaten

    Old, overweight Winky, barely
    Old, weightdrained Tarver impressive, but still Tarver was a zombie in there

    The only great fight he has had was against Joe Calzaghe and they came up about even either way.
    And the Pavlik fight, but still I thought it was obvious his style would do that to Pavlik.

    You can't compare him and his competition to his prime because the guys he is fighting aren't in their prime either, except Pavlik but that was obvious if HOpkins fought he would win like that, at least to me.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2422
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Didn't we just do this 2 weeks ago? Or right after Hopkins beat Pavlik. The consensus is that Bernard is NOT in his prime its ridiculous to say. Also look at who he has just beaten

    Old, overweight Winky, barely
    Old, weightdrained Tarver impressive, but still Tarver was a zombie in there

    The only great fight he has had was against Joe Calzaghe and they came up about even either way.
    And the Pavlik fight, but still I thought it was obvious his style would do that to Pavlik.

    You can't compare him and his competition to his prime because the guys he is fighting aren't in their prime either, except Pavlik but that was obvious if HOpkins fought he would win like that, at least to me.
    I refer the Right Honourable Gnetleman to the answer I gave some moments ago

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Didn't we just do this 2 weeks ago? Or right after Hopkins beat Pavlik. The consensus is that Bernard is NOT in his prime its ridiculous to say. Also look at who he has just beaten

    Old, overweight Winky, barely
    Old, weightdrained Tarver impressive, but still Tarver was a zombie in there

    The only great fight he has had was against Joe Calzaghe and they came up about even either way.
    And the Pavlik fight, but still I thought it was obvious his style would do that to Pavlik.

    You can't compare him and his competition to his prime because the guys he is fighting aren't in their prime either, except Pavlik but that was obvious if HOpkins fought he would win like that, at least to me.
    It's not ridiculous to say btw. Some people get better with age.
    Look at Randy Cotoure.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1498
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Quote Originally Posted by intoccabile View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Didn't we just do this 2 weeks ago? Or right after Hopkins beat Pavlik. The consensus is that Bernard is NOT in his prime its ridiculous to say. Also look at who he has just beaten

    Old, overweight Winky, barely
    Old, weightdrained Tarver impressive, but still Tarver was a zombie in there

    The only great fight he has had was against Joe Calzaghe and they came up about even either way.
    And the Pavlik fight, but still I thought it was obvious his style would do that to Pavlik.

    You can't compare him and his competition to his prime because the guys he is fighting aren't in their prime either, except Pavlik but that was obvious if HOpkins fought he would win like that, at least to me.
    It's not ridiculous to say btw. Some people get better with age.
    Look at Randy Cotoure.
    Name one of those guys besides maybe Calzaghe that were anywhere near their prime. Tarver? Winky?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by intoccabile View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Didn't we just do this 2 weeks ago? Or right after Hopkins beat Pavlik. The consensus is that Bernard is NOT in his prime its ridiculous to say. Also look at who he has just beaten

    Old, overweight Winky, barely
    Old, weightdrained Tarver impressive, but still Tarver was a zombie in there

    The only great fight he has had was against Joe Calzaghe and they came up about even either way.
    And the Pavlik fight, but still I thought it was obvious his style would do that to Pavlik.

    You can't compare him and his competition to his prime because the guys he is fighting aren't in their prime either, except Pavlik but that was obvious if HOpkins fought he would win like that, at least to me.
    It's not ridiculous to say btw. Some people get better with age.
    Look at Randy Cotoure.
    Name one of those guys besides maybe Calzaghe that were anywhere near their prime. Tarver? Winky?
    Did I say he was in his prime?
    I said its not ridiculous to say. Look how much more disciplined and skilled
    he is today. He's never been this "skilled".

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1498
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Tarver wasn't, Winky wasn't better, he was way slower when he fought Hopkins at 170, way less sharp.

    I think Joe is the only won that would beat himself in his prime as he is now. I think he has put on speed by taking off the power on his punches.

    The point I am making is that regardless of who HOpkins has been fighting he was better in his prime.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Tarver wasn't, Winky wasn't better, he was way slower when he fought Hopkins at 170, way less sharp.

    I think Joe is the only won that would beat himself in his prime as he is now. I think he has put on speed by taking off the power on his punches.

    The point I am making is that regardless of who HOpkins has been fighting he was better in his prime.
    Understood. But in bhops "physical" prime, he did not have the "skill" he has now.
    Right now, imo, he is in his prime, technically. Not physically.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2422
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Didn't we just do this 2 weeks ago? Or right after Hopkins beat Pavlik. The consensus is that Bernard is NOT in his prime its ridiculous to say. Also look at who he has just beaten

    Old, overweight Winky, barely
    Old, weightdrained Tarver impressive, but still Tarver was a zombie in there

    The only great fight he has had was against Joe Calzaghe and they came up about even either way.
    And the Pavlik fight, but still I thought it was obvious his style would do that to Pavlik.

    You can't compare him and his competition to his prime because the guys he is fighting aren't in their prime either, except Pavlik but that was obvious if HOpkins fought he would win like that, at least to me.
    In that case which fights do you think warrant B-Hop being a great? Robert Allen, Joe Lipsey? John David Jackson?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1498
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Didn't we just do this 2 weeks ago? Or right after Hopkins beat Pavlik. The consensus is that Bernard is NOT in his prime its ridiculous to say. Also look at who he has just beaten

    Old, overweight Winky, barely
    Old, weightdrained Tarver impressive, but still Tarver was a zombie in there

    The only great fight he has had was against Joe Calzaghe and they came up about even either way.
    And the Pavlik fight, but still I thought it was obvious his style would do that to Pavlik.

    You can't compare him and his competition to his prime because the guys he is fighting aren't in their prime either, except Pavlik but that was obvious if HOpkins fought he would win like that, at least to me.
    In that case which fights do you think warrant B-Hop being a great? Robert Allen, Joe Lipsey? John David Jackson?
    Because he was old as well, He fought at Tarver's weight, he dominated the middleweight division for as long as he did without any trouble. Back to why do I think he is great? JUST WATCH him in his prime, he was amazing. How many times do I ahve to say you don't need a certain opposition to be great, its how you fight. Whether its Bernard winning for so long the way he did or Calzaghe doing it or Jones doing it or Mayweather doing it, they all are great fighter, to bring it every fight is something VERY few people can do.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1253
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: 43 Year old Hopkins is Prime Hopkins ?

    No way.

    Hopkins prime was from 97 to 03.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is hopkins in his prime?
    By LondonBB in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-26-2008, 03:38 AM
  2. Hopkins vs. Wright was 2nd highest grossing ppv this year
    By frozensolid_702 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 12:37 PM
  3. Is Hopkins the best 42+ year old fighter in history?
    By SweetPea in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-24-2007, 06:37 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-18-2007, 12:03 AM
  5. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-19-2006, 08:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing