Has leftylee not got any idea why this weight issue has been mentioned about the fight..
Has leftylee not got any idea why this weight issue has been mentioned about the fight..
dont Fuck with the chuck
im a hatton fan and he would never could never beat mayweather
OK bud, here goes, for starters Floyd WILL always beat Hatton, but would have a tougher time at lite welter why ... its dead simple,
Because the mental attitude Hatton develops at lite welter is a million miles away from the one he has at welter.....
Why?
Because Hatton has to train like a b*****d to get down to that weight, & everything has to be spot on A plus or he cant make the weight ... no odd pints of guiness or meat pies...he trains to such an extent that he becomes sharper and less sluggish, he becomes lean as fk, strong mean & hard because of what he has had to go thru....at lite welter he cant cut one corner ... not one ...but he can at welter & has in the past ...
He would still get beat by Floyd at this weight ... but dont make the mistake of thinking this would be exactly the same because it wouldnt, yes he would still prob lose, but you sure as hell would see a different fight from Hatton at LW....
& for the record Im a massive fan of both & picked Hatton to get stopped after 8 rounds in there previous dust up at Welter...
![]()
Last edited by bambamdaddio; 11-26-2008 at 09:17 PM.
Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
Sorry, but that's a bullshit excuse and it doesn't make any sense. The problem then, according to you, is his dedication, not the weight. If he would've been so much better at 140, why not weigh in at 140 then?
If you can't be properly motivated to train to the maximum extent of your ability when you are facing the best boxer in the world, then you a are a fucking joke.
You would see the exact same fight from Hatton at 140.
Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
lol, how am I taking things personally? I just feel that your explanation is invalid and extremely flawed. I seriously doubt that a fighter with Hatton's drive and ability would need the extra edge that making 140 provides. And if that is the case, Hatton and his team should be well aware of it, so why not weigh in at 140 then? It's not like he would need the extra weight against PBF, they would still end up entering the ring at a similar weight.
PVF,in addition to being an accurate, counter-punching, defensive master is simply a better fighter than Hatton in almost every, if not every, aspect of the game. I was cheering for Hatton, and I would if they should fight again, but they could meet at any weight from 105-300lbs and PBF would win.
How am I wrong? Refute some of my points and I'll gladly continue the discussion with you.
Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
The only thing Ricky Hatton could beat Floyd Mayweather at is a drinking contest.
Hatton belongs at 140 because thats where he is natually stronger than most of his opponents and being stronger is a big part of his game because he likes to swarm, hold, hit.
At 147 that part of his game isn't as effective because the guys are bigger and stronger their as it showed with Collazo and Mayweather.
To me though that isn't an excuse to why he lost to Mayweather.
I feel even at 140 Mayweather would put on a very similar performance because he is simply the bigger, smarter, better boxer.
I havent read any of the replies to this thread so i appologise if this has been said already...
I know opposing fighters weights can vary greatly from weigh-in to fight night but the weight itself could not of been an issue here as Both guys must of been weighing the same that night.
Maybe it was a case of Floyd being bigger than Ricky thought. It is apparent that Floyds frame had grown over the years and the mistake could have been made that although Ricky was moving up in weight, he assumed he was facing a naturally smaller man.
I personally dont like to call Floyd a naturally smaller man. Its akin to me saying Ricky Hatton is a natural Middleweight becuase he consumes copious amounts of pies and guiness in between fights
Floyd was, at one point, STARVING himself to malke 130. Fact.
If both guys kept in resonable shape im sure there'd only be a half-stone differential in weight.
Never the less, Knowledge is power....
I believe the real issue is that Floyd had some key experience prior to Hatton in beating Baldomir and Dela Hoya, who were so much bigger in the ring than Hatton.
Dela Hoya Specifically because not only was he bigger but he was, beleive it or not, the 1st guy in a championship fight (maybe any fight) to have a bigger reach than Floyd.
Also Floyd had the knowledge of Hatton's last visit up at WW
Hatton would of stod a much bigger chance of winning IF the fight was made at 140 ONLY when Floyd was campainging at that weight. Floyd wouldn't of been so comfortable and Hattons pressure would of been more telling but Floyd would probably still come through just like he did with Castillo (albeit over 24 rounds)![]()
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
I remember Kerry Kayes saying before the fight when asked how Floyd has managed to gup in weight and stay lean and strong, he said that Floyd was probably starving himself, whereas Ricky does the weight quite easy, also Ricky started out boxing in a weight lifters gym so probably had a head start on the muscle growth, hes probably at his bodys best weight for boxing, whereas Floyd probably never got in to weights until much later and his body has now reached its best potential.
Rickys problem was arrogance, he looked at Floyd and saw a smaller fighter, he fought like he was the stranger man, he didnt try and box and rushed in to get countered, I see him being more effective in a rematch but I think hed still get caught too often and probably stopped.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks