Most overrated boxer

[C-Lo]

Pac made Morales, Barrera, and Marquez look overrated. He's 5W 1L 1D with 3 KOs and 12 KDs combined against them. How could you call Pacquiao overrated? God I can't stand dumb people.

. . . and I cant stand retards like you

Pacs never beatern a fighter in his prime. That makes him over rated. Was Tervor Berbick great cuz he beat a washed up Ali ? No .

So Pacman never beat a single fighter in his prime? Its funny people only think guys like this only think Pacquiao big wins have been against these three mexican greats.

ALso JMM was 30-31 that is considered in or near you prime these days.
Barrera was 30 when Pacquiao beat him

after that Barrera beat
Ayala, Morales, Peden, Rocky Juarezx2, and he fought a close fight with JMM.

And immediately before losing to Pacquiao the two years before that Barrera
beat Morales, Kevin Kelly, Tapia, and had his big win over Hamed.

If anything around the first fight Barrera was in the prime of his new style that he incorporated.

You could make an argument that MOrales wasn't in his prime, but people thought he was near it just a year earlier as he fought a great fight with Barrera, and people are acting like he dominated Pacquiao, but he won by a round or two in reality. The difference the next time they met was that Pacquiao had continued to improve.

JMM like I said is roughyl in the same stage of his career as Calzaghe is right now, physically he might not be quite where he was, but he has made up for that by making adjustments to his style, and he just Ko'ed Casamayor, dominated Juarez, beat Barrera in a good fight. In the first fight JMM like I said was definitely in his prime, in the second one he was very close to it.

Regardless all Morales, Barrera, JMM were in the top 10 p4p when Pacquiao beat them. That is saying something.

GREAT POST! That is about as factual as you can get. No fanboyism, no insulting, just facts!

BTW, Morales was in his late 20s when he fought Pacquiao.