Of course Id like to even hear the Stones doing proper big band,because "Your Mother Should Know" was allmost perfect fpr the style.
And the most of amazing thing about the Beatles is they did it in such a short time frame. Thats whats allways amazed me about the Clash as well
Rock and Roll.
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=ResLOFXJAhA
Brah,thats passable blue grass
I'll live by this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr4Mu...eature=related
yeah, but that's not a beatles or a stones song that she's singing. And Townes van Zandt, the artist in my video, is not really known as a bluegrass guy, but he is a great songwriter.![]()
OK I'll show you Rolling Stones versitility
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxHE876o3ME
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVEdYYMlOJ4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ki2daAPp_k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex1nxuM1fU8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MejtR81RzCo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn6kHgA-eRE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJMnES7WoT4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx07A9LWBJA
The Rolling Stones simply rocked harder than The Beatles ever did...I like The Beatles and all but no way they top the stones.
And Elvis beats them all....he was just one dude
The Stones did rock harder. The Beatles were artist and could rock and play some of the best love songs the world has ever known. They were much deeper than the Stones. As I said before the Stones of 1964 are the Stones of 2009.
Last edited by mrbig1; 02-01-2009 at 06:56 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks