OJ

[kingfrnk]

wow hes finally going to jail and i didnt hear about this.

does anybody else think he should have went the 1st time??

[CFH]

wow hes finally going to jail and i didnt hear about this.

does anybody else think he should have went the 1st time??

That's going to open a can of worms, but I certainly do. However, that had to be the most inept way to prosecute a case.

Anyways, I hope he enjoys the group showers. Maybe he'll finally find the real killers there, he's already checked all the sand bunkers...

[kingfrnk]

wow hes finally going to jail and i didnt hear about this.

does anybody else think he should have went the 1st time??

That's going to open a can of worms, but I certainly do. However, that had to be the most inept way to prosecute a case.

Anyways, I hope he enjoys the group showers. Maybe he'll finally find the real killers there, he's already checked all the sand bunkers...

i never actually seen the whole case. but i always hear that he should have went to jail.

its probably on youtube some where il check it out later to give a better opinion.

[CGM]

wow hes finally going to jail and i didnt hear about this.

does anybody else think he should have went the 1st time??

That's going to open a can of worms, but I certainly do. However, that had to be the most inept way to prosecute a case.

Anyways, I hope he enjoys the group showers. Maybe he'll finally find the real killers there, he's already checked all the sand bunkers...

i never actually seen the whole case. but i always hear that he should have went to jail.

its probably on youtube some where il check it out later to give a better opinion.

Nah man, the trial went on for weeks, months. It was on TV for hours every day. Don't rely on Youtube to form an opinion, although it might be a good place to find out other's opinions.

[kingfrnk]

That's going to open a can of worms, but I certainly do. However, that had to be the most inept way to prosecute a case.

Anyways, I hope he enjoys the group showers. Maybe he'll finally find the real killers there, he's already checked all the sand bunkers...

i never actually seen the whole case. but i always hear that he should have went to jail.

its probably on youtube some where il check it out later to give a better opinion.

Nah man, the trial went on for weeks, months. It was on TV for hours every day. Don't rely on Youtube to form an opinion, although it might be a good place to find out other's opinions.

youtube opinions are mostly racist. but im sure some of the trial is on there.

[CGM]

i never actually seen the whole case. but i always hear that he should have went to jail.

its probably on youtube some where il check it out later to give a better opinion.

Nah man, the trial went on for weeks, months. It was on TV for hours every day. Don't rely on Youtube to form an opinion, although it might be a good place to find out other's opinions.

youtube opinions are mostly racist. but im sure some of the trial is on there.

Oh definitely. But my guess is most of what you find will be very selective, and posted mostly to further a point of view, racist or otherwise. But go ahead, you may find some stuff of value.

This web site seems to be quite informative, and impartial, at first glance. It's published by a law school.

The Trial of O. J. Simpson

[Diane]

No sentence yet, but here is what OJ was saying in court today.

O.J. Simpson: 'I was stupid. I'm sorry' - CNN.com

[Trainer Monkey]

It wasnt the jury,it was the prosecution,they didnt check their sources,and the defense ripped them apart.
I could care less if OJ goes down for this,but in the double homicide,you just couldnt convict him. If the standard is "Beyond a reasonable doubt" and both the lead investigator,and the lead forensic investigator,both get caught lying on the witness stand,youve got your reasonable doubt

[CGM]

It wasnt the jury,it was the prosecution,they didnt check their sources,and the defense ripped them apart.
I could care less if OJ goes down for this,but in the double homicide,you just couldnt convict him. If the standard is "Beyond a reasonable doubt" and both the lead investigator,and the lead forensic investigator,both get caught lying on the witness stand,youve got your reasonable doubt

As for the supposed lies, I don't recall what the lies were about, I don't think they were directly related to the case, but they did cast doubt on prosecution witness credibilty. but I can't say this was a showstopper.

Definitely the prosecution was flawed. The defense team and expert witnesses were definitely higher priced and tehrefore better. But prosecution wasn't that bad, there was plenty of credible DNA evidence to go along with questionable evidence. The whole "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit" was a crock of shit, the prosecution should have raised holy hell with that one.

The jury for the most part was not well educated, there was a lot of very technical evidence that went right over their heads. This was by design. There's some more doubt for you.

Also from the defense perspective, jury members were chosen because of their likelihood of being favorable influenced by the race card. But that's a can of worms too, isn't it? I watched post trial interviews of the jurors, it was pretty obvious.

But yeah, this one is a can of worms, go ahead and disagree with any of this, I don't have the patience for a long debate with you. Not this time anyway.

regards.

[Trainer Monkey]

It wasnt the jury,it was the prosecution,they didnt check their sources,and the defense ripped them apart.
I could care less if OJ goes down for this,but in the double homicide,you just couldnt convict him. If the standard is "Beyond a reasonable doubt" and both the lead investigator,and the lead forensic investigator,both get caught lying on the witness stand,youve got your reasonable doubt

As for the supposed lies, I don't recall what the lies were about, I don't think they were directly related to the case, but they did cast doubt on prosecution witness credibilty. but I can't say this was a showstopper.

Definitely the prosecution was flawed. The defense team and expert witnesses were definitely higher priced and tehrefore better. But prosecution wasn't that bad, there was plenty of credible DNA evidence to go along with questionable evidence. The whole "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit" was a crock of shit, the prosecution should have raised holy hell with that one.

The jury for the most part was not well educated, there was a lot of very technical evidence that went right over their heads. This was by design. There's some more doubt for you.

Also from the defense perspective, jury members were chosen because of their likelihood of being favorable influenced by the race card. But that's a can of worms too, isn't it? I watched post trial interviews of the jurors, it was pretty obvious.

But yeah, this one is a can of worms, go ahead and disagree with any of this, I don't have the patience for a long debate with you. Not this time anyway.

regards.

It was real simple
Question to the lead detective,"Do you have any adverse views towards African Americans?"
"No"
"What do you say to this taped phone conversation where you use the N word 23 times in 5 minutes"
Boned
To the lead forensic investigator
"Do you allways follow investigative procedure?"
"Yes"
"And that would involve wearing gloves at a crime scene?"
"Yes"
"Well what do you say to this film we have of you going over evidence at the crime scene not wearing latex gloves"
Boned
They boned the case

Everybody suspects that if OJ didnt do it himself, he at least paid for it,but you just couldnt convict on compromised evidence.
Maybe it even went down the way OJ's defense team floated it,Nicole had been putting up somebody who owed drug dealers money,and they came to collect.
Still doesnt make the Juice a nice guy.

[CGM]

wow hes finally going to jail and i didnt hear about this.

does anybody else think he should have went the 1st time??

I do. But he had very good lawyers, and it was a questionable jury.