That sounds good, I wonder if that's going to apply to national competition as well.
Times are changing, I'd like to see that amateur "throw a lot of punches" philosophy become more about pacing and selecting their punches.
That sounds good, I wonder if that's going to apply to national competition as well.
Times are changing, I'd like to see that amateur "throw a lot of punches" philosophy become more about pacing and selecting their punches.
If you hear a voice within you saying that I am not a painter, then by all means paint and that voice will be silenced.
ok I'm meant to be offline doing job applications right now but i just couldn't resist sharing this when i saw it .... by accident while applying for jobs ......
A science paper on gender differences in sport:
Evaluation of gender differences in physiology: an introduction
Mark A. Tarnopolskya and Wim H.M. Sarisb
This gender bias is even more poignant given recent evidence that has shown that females may in fact be better suited to ultra-endurance sports compared with males [10]. A `®eld' study matched males and females for
performance times at the 56 km distance and found that the females outperformed the males at the 90 km distance [10]. Regression analysis has shown that males outperform females at distances up to *42 km, with an increasing performance advantage for females above an intercept of 66 km [10]. Another group reported that equally trained males and females performed similarly at 42 km, yet the females outperformed the males at the 90 km distance [11].
Sourpuss - I think i speak on behalf of both of us regarding this idea that we can't do rounds which are a minute longer like the guys - to those AIBA knobs who decided this:
![]()
Geebus, nevermind the 3x3. Guess I am stuck at 4x2 until I am old enough to drink and go to war?
These classifications are clear as mud and seem to overlap themselves.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks