Boxrec RULES!!!!

[XaduBoxer]

Surely, you don't need me to point out the flaw in your argument, it's pretty obvious.

OK here's the facts, you can eat this if you want...

PAC's present rankings:
#2 at 135 Ring Mag
#5 at 147 Ring Mag
#1 at 135 Fightnews
#1 at 140 BoxRec

You see that? PAC is ranked at 135, 140 and 147 with #1 at 135 and 140... So why all the fuzz?
.

let's try this again FAIL.

BoxRec rankings has its own flaws...

Ring Mag has flaws (Wow Ring Mag ranked PAC in 2 divisions at the same time, 135 and 147, that's incredible).

Fightnews has flaws...

But just remember this, PAC being highly ranked by several rankings organizations in several multiple weight divisions has some basis and reasons... I thinks they can fully explain and back up their high rankings fro PAC... Why not send them an email?
.

[killersheep]

OK here's the facts, you can eat this if you want...

PAC's present rankings:
#2 at 135 Ring Mag
#5 at 147 Ring Mag
#1 at 135 Fightnews
#1 at 140 BoxRec

You see that? PAC is ranked at 135, 140 and 147 with #1 at 135 and 140... So why all the fuzz?
.

let's try this again FAIL.

BoxRec rankings has its own flaws...

Ring Mag has flaws (Wow Ring Mag ranked PAC in 2 divisions at the same time, 135 and 147, that's incredible).

Fightnews has flaws...

But just remember this, PAC being highly ranked by several rankings organizations in several multiple weight divisions has some basis and reasons... I thinks they can fully explain and back up their high rankings fro PAC... Why not send them an email?
.

Oh, so you had no point the whole time.