Boxrec RULES!!!!

[XaduBoxer]

Yes that's what I want.

Are you sure? Is that all you want from me? LOL ha ha
.

Well since you aren't confident enough in your argument to bring in your own evidence for your case, we can safely say you had no point to begin with and you're just talking. Therefore the thread stands as valid. It's ridiculous to have PAC ranked at #1 at 140.

Of course you have all the right to grumble here but as what I suggested, please contact BoxRec for it might be a big mistake putting PAC at #1 at 140... It's really unbelievable... Please do contact BoxRec...

Don't forget to post BoxRec's reply here, OK?
.

[killersheep]

Are you sure? Is that all you want from me? LOL ha ha
.

Well since you aren't confident enough in your argument to bring in your own evidence for your case, we can safely say you had no point to begin with and you're just talking. Therefore the thread stands as valid. It's ridiculous to have PAC ranked at #1 at 140.

Of course you have all the right to grumble here but as what I suggested, please contact BoxRec for it might be a big mistake putting PAC at #1 at 140... It's really unbelievable... Please do contact BoxRec...

Don't forget to post BoxRec's reply here, OK?
.

It's your responsibility don't pawn your work off on me.

[killersheep]

[XaduBoxer]

Nice artwork there killa... I love it... I didn't know you're a great artist and debater (?) ...
.

[killersheep]

Nice artwork there killa... I love it... I didn't know you're a great artist and debater (?) ...
.

You get a response from BoxRec yet?

[XaduBoxer]

Nice artwork there killa... I love it... I didn't know you're a great artist and debater (?) ...
.

You get a response from BoxRec yet?

I have no problem with them placing PAC as #1 at 140... Why hassle myself about this...

To those who vehemently protested about this ranking, why not throw tomatoes, rotten eggs, etc. on BoxRec ...
.

[killersheep]

Nice artwork there killa... I love it... I didn't know you're a great artist and debater (?) ...
.

You get a response from BoxRec yet?

I have no problem with them placing PAC as #1 at 140... Why hassle myself about this...

To those who vehemently protested about this ranking, why not throw tomatoes, rotten eggs, etc. on BoxRec ...
.

So you also agree that PAC is #5 p4p behind JMM?

[XaduBoxer]

Well since you aren't confident enough in your argument to bring in your own evidence for your case, we can safely say you had no point to begin with and you're just talking. Therefore the thread stands as valid. It's ridiculous to have PAC ranked at #1 at 140.

Of course you have all the right to grumble here but as what I suggested, please contact BoxRec for it might be a big mistake putting PAC at #1 at 140... It's really unbelievable... Please do contact BoxRec...

Don't forget to post BoxRec's reply here, OK?
.

It's your responsibility don't pawn your work off on me.

You're the one who protested about it, questioning about it... For me, I just accepted it as it is... but could be a big fatal mistake
.

[Spicoli]

..........guess the crutches are needed after all.No independent thought from fanboy numba 1.

[killersheep]

..........guess the crutches are needed after all.No independent thought from fanboy numba 1.

Actually he's convinced me...........I now believe only in boxrec rankings!!

PAC # 5 p4p right behind JMM!!!!!!!!1111

[XaduBoxer]

..........guess the crutches are needed after all.No independent thought from fanboy numba 1.

It's very difficult to justify for BoxRec's behalf so why not ask BoxRec for such very unbelievable ranking of PAC?

I just take it as it is since for me, there's possibility that PAC can be considered as no. 1 at 140 as what I pointed out in my previous posts here... It's also possible, that this is a big error... Hope killa can contact/email BoxRec...

[Spicoli]

..........guess the crutches are needed after all.No independent thought from fanboy numba 1.

It's very difficult to justify for BoxRec's behalf so why not ask BoxRec for such very unbelievable ranking of PAC?

I just take it as it is since for me, there's possibility that PAC can be considered as no. 1 at 140 as what I pointed out in my previous posts here... It's also possible, that this is a big error... Hope killa can contact/email BoxRec...

You wanna jump through rhetorical hoops or do you actually have a debatable stance on your #1 favorite fighter.Why should he be ranked on par with Hatton at 140 as best when he has never competed there?Yaaawn....checking watch