Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!

Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer

Originally Posted by
killersheep

Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I have no problem with them placing PAC as #1 at 140... Why hassle myself about this...
To those who vehemently protested about this ranking, why not throw tomatoes, rotten eggs, etc. on BoxRec ...

.
So you also agree that PAC is #5 p4p behind JMM?
I have no crazy problem with that... they have their own basis and computations for that... heck, Vazquez is no. 3 P4P, JMM 4 and PAC 5... There's no point of arguing with that...
But having no problem with BoxRec rankings doesn't mean I totally agree with them completely... lol

.
So you're back to not having a point.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks