Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!

Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer

Originally Posted by
killersheep

Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I've mentioned my own reasons why PAC could be ahead of Hatton at 140 but you immediately trashed it. Your main reason why you can't accept it because PAC has not fought at 140 which were not really observed by rankings orgs and therefore not a very valid point.
I'm confused, if you are ranking who is the best fighter at 140 why would you use any data from another weight class?
BoxRec did it... As I've said no point in continuing to question BoxRec's rankings... We all know it's a computerized ranking point system.
Goodbye?
So why use data from other weight classes? Computerized or not.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks