You will be sad then
As for Mr140 Steroid Nation: The evidence against Evander Holyfield
![]()
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
You will be sad then
As for Mr140 Steroid Nation: The evidence against Evander Holyfield
![]()
Well that does not show much my friend he never tested postive to if so all that is nothing but a opinion and yea i find it hard that with all the kids he has he was using steriods because it would of prevented it. All i read is that they thought he used it and then he said he did not and they droped it so that does not prove anything i am sorry still wont got that way in think Holyfeild did anything because he was never tested for it so that were i stand till they actually test him postive.
Array
I would have to agree with icb i think you just hate Holyfeild because he beat Tyson so i think you should get over it Holyfeild was just a better fighter and he went on to do more in the sport and not be done in and quite on the ground he keeps going on even though he is 46 and still has a heart problem and still he goes on with everything one thing i can say about Evander Holyfeild is he never gives up he just keeps going how he while end up because of it who know but that just Holyfeild.
Array
Look as i said before they never tested him postive so there is no solid proof on him and that is the way i look at it so that all i have to say.
If you dislike Holyfield, at least dislike him for the right reasons. He beat Tyson legitamately...twice....and im a Tyson fan. Fouls happen, as a Tyson fan you should know this. If you think Holyfield should have had a point deduction, your beef should be with the ref. It is the refs job to maintain control in the fight. It wouldnt have mattered though cause Holyfield was beating him in every category at his own game.
As for the steroid controversy, in this county you are innocent until proved guilty. The prosecution, or in this case the commitee investigating this matter, has the burden of proof. The supposed evidence against him is circumstancial, as there is no hard evidence against Holyfield. They failed to make a case, and Holyfield should be given the benefit of the doubt until something substancial is brought to light.
Only Forum Amature With Well Over 2000 Posts!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks