If you dislike Holyfield, at least dislike him for the right reasons. He beat Tyson legitamately...twice....and im a Tyson fan. Fouls happen, as a Tyson fan you should know this. If you think Holyfield should have had a point deduction, your beef should be with the ref. It is the refs job to maintain control in the fight. It wouldnt have mattered though cause Holyfield was beating him in every category at his own game.

As for the steroid controversy, in this county you are innocent until proved guilty. The prosecution, or in this case the commitee investigating this matter, has the burden of proof. The supposed evidence against him is circumstancial, as there is no hard evidence against Holyfield. They failed to make a case, and Holyfield should be given the benefit of the doubt until something substancial is brought to light.