Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 134

Thread: Boxrec RULES!!!!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2582
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Come'on people, Killer started this thread protesting why PAC is rated #1 by BoxRec at 140 when in fact PAC has not fought at 140 (Killer's main argument why PAC can't be rated at 140)... Then I pointed out that BoxRec, WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO, Fightnews ranked boxers even if they haven't fought in a certain division...

    Now if PAC will be rated by BoxRec at 147, a division he just fought at, BoxRec will still rank PAC as #1 at 147 because PAC has the highest points among boxers at 147 according to BoxRec computerized points system. Higher than Margo, Mosley, Cotto...

    Does anybody has any problems with BoxRec ranking PAC as #1 at 147?? PAC has just fought in that division...

    BoxRec, WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO, Fightnews, Ring Mag ranking system could be flawed... Better live with it people since there's no perfect system... They could be flawed on how they calculate the rankings and others were flawed by corruption and boxing politics...

    That's all my points...
    .

    i have a problem with that point. Oscar isnt rated at 147 at ALL so why the hell would pac get rated at 147 at all?? that just stupid to rank Pac at 147 cause he beat oscar who wasnt rated at 147.

  2. #2
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Boxrec RULES!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Come'on people, Killer started this thread protesting why PAC is rated #1 by BoxRec at 140 when in fact PAC has not fought at 140 (Killer's main argument why PAC can't be rated at 140)... Then I pointed out that BoxRec, WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO, Fightnews ranked boxers even if they haven't fought in a certain division...

    Now if PAC will be rated by BoxRec at 147, a division he just fought at, BoxRec will still rank PAC as #1 at 147 because PAC has the highest points among boxers at 147 according to BoxRec computerized points system. Higher than Margo, Mosley, Cotto...

    Does anybody has any problems with BoxRec ranking PAC as #1 at 147?? PAC has just fought in that division...

    BoxRec, WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO, Fightnews, Ring Mag ranking system could be flawed... Better live with it people since there's no perfect system... They could be flawed on how they calculate the rankings and others were flawed by corruption and boxing politics...

    That's all my points...
    .

    i have a problem with that point. Oscar isnt rated at 147 at ALL so why the hell would pac get rated at 147 at all?? that just stupid to rank Pac at 147 cause he beat oscar who wasnt rated at 147.

    As expected, many people will have problems if BoxRec will rank PAC #1 at 147 division. Just like how many people had problems with PAC #1 at 140 or if ranked #1 at 135 division...
    .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Nevada changes rules
    By Taeth in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 05:51 PM
  2. Now What Now What Pavlik Rules!!!!
    By huntin_itai in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 07:06 AM
  3. WHICH RULES DO U PREFER?
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-09-2007, 01:25 PM
  4. Rules for us Ladies...
    By emma in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-30-2006, 12:42 AM
  5. Hatton vs PBF MMA rules
    By MikeTysonKnockOut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 03:07 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing