Man...what a fukkin cold winter this is...

[Andre]

Yes go right ahead and try and discredit my view simply because I disagree with Al Gore. Sure I could bring up past stories about Global Warming, Global Cooling, or Climate Change from waaaaaay back in the day and all the choas and havoc they thought was going to go on and we're still here but that wouldn't matter as "new science" has provided new theories and new hypothesi about what affect we're having on the Earth. All I am saying is Al Gore is wrong and I have an opinion that's different from his, I'm not trying to sell books or movies or light bulbs and I don't benefit at all from having a different view, infact I suffer because recognizing "global warming/cooling/climate change" is the DEFAULT position of universities, the media, and so on but there are scientists who I agree with but it doesn't matter as everyone tries to discredit them as well.....so compare me with Sarah Palin if you like, I don't like her, I don't think like her but that too is the DEFAULT position of the left, whenever a Republican, Conservative, or anyone else disagrees with you just call them stupid...don't try and have a debate with them, don't have an intelligent conversation with them, just insult their intelligence and leave it at that.

Man, you just contradicted yourself within one statement. Kinda like saying all democrats generalize. But let's not make this discussion into something it's not. I'm asking whether or not you agreed with Palin's position on global warming. This ain't about her smarts, or lack thereof. I'll assume the political leanings of Gore and Palin is a coincidence and has nothing to do with your position..

There are those who think that global warming is primarily caused by man made activities, and that the problems are going to continue to get worse and that we should try to change our ways a bit in order to do something. And there is a lot of science to support that.

And there are those who think Global warming is a natural thing, that is not caused by man's activities. That's the Palin theory, thouugh she ain't the only one. There is some science to support that, mostly the support is a reverse kind of proof, "It has not been absolutely proven that this is not the case"

Bush, he seems unable or unwilling to do anything, but he seems to lean towards option 2.

To diminish position I by calling it the "default position" is pure horseshit. Besides what do the fucking universities know anyway, right? Again you're making the same sort of mistake you accused me of making. The level of international opinion and scientific research is massively in favor of position I with the effect of greenhouse gases, burning of fossil fuels etc.

But yeah, there are some scientists who take position II

What's your position? From what I can tell, it seems more like position II. It seems like you are not ready to concede that global warming even exists, am I right?

I think Lyle is on the side that says its all trumped up beyond its real damages and they make it worse etc so that it creates a mega business out of the fearful. Aside from the political snowball they try to exact from it ; backing from the green side as the world thinks more that way the numbers increase over to that political side.

Both sides hold some water if the truth is known but to make it just a political issue first ,is head in the sand stuff and doesnt help anyone.

I've even heard some scientists state that our own pollutants are creating a shield across some ozone depleted holes against some of the damaging rays that would otherwise mess up photosinthesis etc. So theres the first catch 22 in real terms.

It is true, our reefs are being bleached by the suns rays the great barrier reef is nearly dead some say it was change from the warmer currents etc.
Probably a bit of both. Now star fish are cleaning up all thats left so its bare.

Pollutants are our main worry though ,cemical run off from farms and industry etc, frogs dissapear and we dissapear along with them. Deforestation second problem that equals no water retention aside from the obvious habitat ones. Once you break the life chain in a major fashion its every link for itself so to say humans and our industry dont have lasting effects and its all natures way is not true either.

Most hide the fact that we are killing each other and the planet off behind arguments for or against certain divisions of the overall problem and try to stand against others who take the opposite stance; so both those groups energies towards a working cure are a waste of time for a start its a head in the sand trick while pretending to care, sort of.

New york has a pile of garbage in the sea like an island ,I mean for fuks sake someone is completly onside with that!
And that is what they allow you to see ,imagine what these businessmen/politians bury where they can get away with it.


I know for a fact that there is a tank thats a 100 feet high and twice the diameter in Melbourne that is full of the liquid that breaks down plastics.This liquid, if you take one pin head of it in a room full of people they are all dead no exceptions.
Its in a yard on the docks (that are ran by the mob over here) . If some fool knew and shot a 303 into the side from one of the side streets it would kill everything for 600 miles which ever way the wind was blowing on that day and we live in a quake zone too!

We suvive the way we do(without total cancerous destruction) mainly because the beef we eat is like a first filter system against the cemical runoff that they ended up drinking in their water.2 4d and 245 twe only banned here some 25 30 years ago ,farmers continued to stock pile and use it secrectly until the stock pile ran dry.
We used to get super phosphate rained onto our roof in pellet form by a crop duster , that house had tank water!

We are all fukin mad the sh!t we put up with cause we are told its all ok,it sure as hell removes the uneducated or the weaker genetic links from within us though. Poor children from those old farm areas cop some major illnesses now.

Greenhouse /Brownhouse.