Scientist finds evidence of "hobbit."

[Kev]

CGM, no disrespect, but you're talking so far out of your ass it's pathetic. In fact, you have very eloquently said absolutely nothing.

you can't randomly or spontaneously form DNA, or any other life bearing molecule.

OK man, you have it your way. But if you think entropy rules out evolution you are pathetically misinformed, no disrespect.

What this one?
Entropy (information theory)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Information entropy)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the Shannon entropy in information theory. For other uses, see Entropy (disambiguation).
This article incorporates material from Shannon's entropy on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the GFDL.
In information theory, entropy (sometimes known as self-information) is a measure of the uncertainty associated with a random variable. The term by itself in this context usually refers to the Shannon entropy, which quantifies, in the sense of an expected value, the information contained in a message, usually in units such as bits. Equivalently, the Shannon entropy is a measure of the average information content one is missing when one does not know the value of the random variable. The concept was introduced by Claude E. Shannon in his 1948 paper "A Mathematical Theory of Communication".


Why cant things co exist ? Why cant thesis co exist?Which leads to the real question why we as people cannot yet fully co exist >


why couldnt the universe be created by divine love frequencies or a God if you need a name; then left to evolve as we surly have?

Leave it to Andre to put up a thread stopping post where we all scratch our heads and wonder what the fuck he's talking about

[Andre]

You panicked and posted twice .
My job here is done..

[Kev]

You panicked and posted twice .
My job here is done..

haha I was confused and disorientated

[Kev]

Actually if I think I'm understanding Andre correctly, he's asking why the seemingly contradictory theories of creation vs evolution can't coexist as the different sides of the same coin.

Well, the answer to that is if you just believe in an idea of God as a creator then it's no problem, God could be responsible for creation, and he could have started it all off through evolution.

However, if you believe in the Abrahamic God of the Christians, Muslims and Jews then the two viewpoints are diametrically opposed.

The Torah, Koran and New Testament all make it clear that death and suffering came into the world only as a consequence of Adam's sin and that prior to that no 'entropy' for want of a better word existed.

Evolution states that chaos, destruction and death were the very elements that combined to form the world as we see it today, a viewpoint completely incompatible with the Biblical and Islamic concepts of God.

The most prominent athiests like Richard Dawkins understand this better than most Christians and Muslims sadly.

The Christian or Muslim who attempts to graft Darwinism onto his religious beliefs and embrace evolution as merely God's method are sadly confused as and in a way deserving of the contempt that the likes of Dawkins and the athiestc heap upon them.

It's two diametrically opposed belief systems, take a stand for one or the other, attempting to sit on the fence and water down all the teachings of your faith in order to accomodate the current teachings of men in white coats is a wretched way to live imo.