No Hatton what ? you honestly think Ricky Hatton is in some of those great British legends leagues ? you need to learn up about some of those fighters. You will be very impressed, some people are forgetting there history here, Ricky Hatton is a good fighter with a few good wins under his belt. But he needs to get a few big wins before i even mention him amongst those legends.
Of your main top 10 list Hatton was at least as good as Buchanan and has done more than Turpin even though his carrer is not over yet.Also its hard to judge the older boxers against todays fighters.
As for Conteh,Benn and Eubank give me a brake.
They were all well loved exciting British boxers but were never in the p4p top ten or even that close.
Eubank admited at the time there were boxers around that he would not fight because they were to good for him.
I think you must have missed Hatton out just to try and be controvercial and a bit different.![]()
Balls
Uhh mate so your going off because i didn't mention Ricky Hatton in the honourable list ? those were the fighters that come to mind first, im not going to list every single very good/great british fighter in the honourable list am i ? he does deserve a mention but he still doesn't make the top 10 no way happy enough now ?![]()
Im not being sensitive at all your the one being sensitive. You had a pop at me in your first post about Ricky Hatton not being there, then i replied back in a respectful way and my last comment was a joke comment which is why i winked at the end of my post, to let you know that my last comment was a joke.
Now you have to have a dig at me and take it too the next level ? too be honest i don't want a debate with you after a comment like that. I have never claimed to know more than anyone on here, nor do i make out im a boxing historian. But i do read up alot of boxing and i do boxing myself, so i would like to think i do know quite a bit about boxing. But nowhere near as much as some guys/girls on here.
Infact the only thing i've done wrong here was give my opinion which obviously riled you up, because you rolled your eyes on my first post then had a dig at me in your 2nd post. If you don't like my opinions, don't reply to me or don't make such subjective threads because everyone has a different opinion.
Last edited by ICB; 01-11-2009 at 09:16 PM.
Jimmy Wilde for me, he had such great longevity and fought so many guys much bigger than himself .... kayoed most of them as well.
If we want to go right back, there was people like Tom Cribb and Jem Mace, but they were prizefighters and not boxers.
I'd have Calzaghe up there - a long career showing he was no flash in the pan and stayed at the top throughout, great chin, professionalism, good skills, OK poncher. Lennox would be there too, but I can't help thinking that he REALLY learned to box in Canada. Loved Nigel Benn, rated Conteh as probably our best talent but he wasted much of it.
I would have to say that I would rate Buchanan higher than Hatton - better skills, less susceptible to cuts, all round technician and tough as nails too, possibly better punch resistance than Ricky (who's all action style will lead to a shorter career a la Smokin Joe)
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Can u answer his question tho? I mean Buchanan was a good fighter but i cannot see how he could be rated as a much better fighter than Hatton? You said Ricky doesnt deserve to be mentioned with these 'legends' but i believe his record is already better than Buchanans or at the least just as good.
I think u are falling into the trap of rating older fighters higher just cos they are older. Freddy Welsh had a pretty good record but a lot of losses, and he fought around WWI, how do u know how good he was?
Theres a few ways to interpret this question so for me it has to be Calzaghe at the top really...Just look at how long he's dominated and he just gets better and better and shut EVERY prick up whoever doubted him and the "who he's beat brigade" finally have to bow down and admit the facts or they simply show themselves to be narrow minded fools..... he gets stick from US fans purely because he wipes the floor with the best they can offer time and time again, in his twighlight years and better still in their back yards!
THE best fighter of my era and his record is untouched by anyone in decades. FACT (deal with it)
Lennox would be my second just for doing it in the US time and time again and avenging anyone who beat him and was the last true Heavyweight to dominate ... The way he destroyed Tyson was a great moment in my life!
Nigel Benn simply because he had balls like King Kong and was easily the most exciting fighter to watch to have ever come out of the UK.
Yeah he lost a few but f*ck me could he tear it up when he was hurt.
And i will never ever forget that Mclleland fight for being the most brutal i have ever seen.
How Nigel survived that and came back to smash G-Man to bits just shows what he was all about.
He had the will and heart of a Lion that man.
Randy Turpin gets props for beating the greatest ever fighter to have lived bar NONE (true fans will know who) and No it aint Ali..he did get another shot in 1966 but unfortunately with a gun pointed at his own head!
Don Cockell just for his name also gets props
Henry Cooper also SHOULD have beaten Clay that night but was blatantly cheated out of it by Ali's bare knuckle glove that tore his face apart.
How different the Fight game history would have been eh...?
For me Hatton needs to beat Pac then he leaps up to Lewis status but he's not far behind.
Just my opinion.
Last edited by smashup; 01-12-2009 at 08:46 AM.
1- Calzaghe
2- Lewis
3- Hatton
4- Cooper
5- Eubank
one dangerous horrible bloke
For me, the greatest British boxer of all time is Robert James "bob" Fitzsimmons.
He was the first three-division champion in the history of boxing. I think he is the only one that I know of, that won the world heavyweight crown, before winning the world light-heavyweight version. He also won the world middleweight earlier on, to make him king of all the three heavier weight divisions in boxing.
He is burried here in our state of Illinois, in Graceland Cemetery, located in about Chicago with another legendary boxing great, Jack Johnson.
Last edited by KananKrus; 01-12-2009 at 05:37 PM.
The list is fine apart from Henry Cooper, who was European level rather than World. Sure he floored Cassius Clay, as he was known at the time, but Clay was young and over confident and got caught by a peach - he got up and won - if you listen to Henry Cooper then Ali had a 10 minute break after the knockdown(The story has been over exaggerated overtime) Ali would have won regardless. Ali never got Ko'd and wasn't goto against the limited Cooper. (Yes, Holmes stopped him but that hardly counts)
It wasn't just Coopers eyes that lost him fights he also had a weak chin and was brutally Ko'd by both Ingemar Johanson, Zora Folley and Floyd Paterson. He also lost to lesser named fighters like the Joe Bygraves, Joe Erskine, Peter Bates, Eric Schoppner and Roger Rischer.
Henry was popular and always tried to give a good account of himself but he is not Top 20 best Brits ever let alone Top 5.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks