Poll: Does Pacquiao Deserve a 60% Share Against Hatton?

Pac deserves 90% because hatton bores me to death.

Blah blah blah blah blah.....

Make this fight happen already!

Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177

tell you what would make this simple, winner gets 60%, 40% to the looser...

Maybe Arum should get off his ass and get a counter offer 55/45. Else let Hatton have 60/40 UK PPV and Pacquiao 60/40 US PPV or go 100% UK Hatton and 100% US Pacquiao.

I think there is more negotiating left here, so I'm getting off this roller coaster cause I just want to see the fight.

Originally Posted by Pacdbest2

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

I can't see any reason to justify Pac claiming 60%

He's not the one with the title.
I don't believe he's the bigger draw.
He's actually more accustomed to fighting in the U.S. than Hatton.


If Pac wants 60% he should put on a championship stake, the winner walks away with 60% the loser 40%

Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?

He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

Originally Posted by Pacdbest2

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

I can't see any reason to justify Pac claiming 60%

He's not the one with the title.
I don't believe he's the bigger draw.
He's actually more accustomed to fighting in the U.S. than Hatton.


If Pac wants 60% he should put on a championship stake, the winner walks away with 60% the loser 40%

Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?

He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?

Originally Posted by josef4334

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

Originally Posted by Pacdbest2

Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?

He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?

I think everything about this fight is 50-50 so the purse should be too IMO!

Originally Posted by KananKrus

Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177

That fat cunt has a serious problem with Brits.

Originally Posted by gudnite vienna

tell you what would make this simple, winner gets 60%, 40% to the looser...

So you agree with 60% for Pacquiao

Originally Posted by awdleyfuturehalloffamer

Pac deserves 90% because hatton bores me to death.

May I bid ?!?
Pacquiao: 91%

Originally Posted by Fenster

Originally Posted by KananKrus

Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177

That fat cunt has a serious problem with Brits.

Do you know why Mike Marley of boxingconfidential, has a serious problem with the British? How and when did that start?

It would be nice for you to let everybody know as to why. It will make his views biased if so! Then I wouldn't wanna read up on him if that is the case.

Calling the guy the female reproductive tract, is not convincing enough as an exhibit A! Please feel free to reinforce you claim with facts! Likewise a cleaned up argument, is a lot clearer to understand. Be advised, that keeping this post as wholesome as possible, is within you!

Originally Posted by josef4334

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

Originally Posted by Pacdbest2

Pac title is the #1 P4P. Who cares about IBO belt?

He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?

Pacquaio beat a version of De la Hoya.
A faded, weight drained, decade past prime De la Hoya.

So although it is imprssive to rise from Superfeatherweight and beat a Welter in one year, he doesn't get the full merit.

Sorry for Hatton fans,and I am one,it really comes down to who has the heat in the US,and right now,thats Pac
60-40 is actually reasonable,he'll be selling 60% of the US buys on the PPV

Originally Posted by KananKrus

Originally Posted by Fenster

Originally Posted by KananKrus

Maybe it can be viewed that a 50/50 split is a bit proud of a claim from the Hatton camp. Flexibility is the order of the day, but definitely it seems, only the Pacquiao's camp is willing to do so at this point in time. A noteworthy concession coming from the Pound for Pound King! wouldn't you say?

Write ups that can somehow give a third party perspective to this.

http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6175
http://www.boxingconfidential.com/articles.php?id=6177

That fat cunt has a serious problem with Brits.

Do you know why Mike Marley of boxingconfidential, has a serious problem with the British? How and when did that start?

It would be nice for you to let everybody know as to why. It will make his views biased if so! Then I wouldn't wanna read up on him if that is the case.

Calling the guy the female reproductive tract, is not convincing enough as an exhibit A! Please feel free to reinforce you claim with facts! Likewise a cleaned up argument, is a lot clearer to understand. Be advised, that keeping this post as wholesome as possible, is within you!

I've never read ANYTHING by him that hasn't been negative towards the Brit.

I understand his style is clearly to be OBNOXIOUS.

He is fat. Fact.

Therefore a FAT CUNT from my perspective

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

Originally Posted by josef4334

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

He is the linear champion, the man who beat the man and the true Champion at 140lbs.

It has nothing to do with belts, Hatton isd the actual champion at 140.

Oscar wasn't the champion, or a contender at any weight.

hatton beat paulie but not as convincingly as pac beat dela hoya. pac paid his dues and now he deserves a bigger slice of the pie.dela hoya might not be a belt holder but he is the biggest ppv draw. you would think that hatton would get 50% against dela hoya if they were to fight?

Pacquaio beat a version of De la Hoya.
A faded, weight drained, decade past prime De la Hoya.

So although it is imprssive to rise from Superfeatherweight and beat a Welter in one year, he doesn't get the full merit.

since ive started posting here every person pacquiao beats is faded, weight drained and past his prime. before the dela hoya fight everybody here thought pac was gonna get ktfo. now that he beat dela hoya, oscar is now faded and past his prime. so i guess those guys he beat get 50% of the credit because they were there to be hit and they had a hard time to catch pacquiao? give pac 50% credit coz he executed his game plan to win? seriously, besides mayweather, odlh who can hatton fight that his cut will be bigger than what he will get with pac at 40% split?