If Manny Pacquiao Pulled Off A Win Vs Hatton.........

[XaduBoxer]

Weighj in weights are no real indication of who is the bigger guy. Thats why i ised the other examples. You show your total lack of knowledge by even putting those weights up.
Ic ould find dozens of examples of fighters who weighed similiar in the weigh in but one guy is far bigger naturally.

The point im making that Pac is naturally a bigger stronger guy and carries far more muscle than Morales, Marquez and Barrera is true. There is no disputing that.
The fact he was lighter on fight night has a lot to do with the fact he trains harder and has a fantastic ability to shed weight easily. Not cos he is the smaller man.

Big deal if Morales weighs more than Pac now he is probably fat cos he doesnt train anymore. Morales would look ridiculous fighting at 147, fat and bloated, but Pac looks quite reasonable at that weight, still ripped and muscular.

Funny... PAC is bigger stronger guy and carries far more muscle than Morales, Marquez and Barrera ?? I think EM, JMM and MAB will not ever accept that PAC is stronger than them... Faster maybe but not stronger...

More muscles ?? PAC is cheating coz he carries far more muscles than everybody else... LOL

Here's your original statement:

"Pac is naturally bigger than MArquez, Barrera, and Morales, but Pacfans didnt see that as a problem when he fought them...."

PAC is never a bigger guy specially compared to Morales...

BTW, when two guys agreed to fight at a certain agreed weight, there's no more questioning on who is the bigger guy... Both of them believes that he has what it takes to beat the other guy...

Well why are u and evry other Pac fan around going on about how great Pacs achievment of fighting and beating the bigger ODLH is? Acoording to your quote:

"BTW, when two guys agreed to fight at a certain agreed weight, there's no more questioning on who is the bigger guy... Both of them believes that he has what it takes to beat the other guy."

In saying that u say that in fact Pac did not even beat a bigger guy, they were the same size cos they decided to fight at the same weight....

Of course 2 guys can be fighting in same division and one can be far bigger than the other. If Pac fought Paul WIlliams at 147 he'd be far smaller.

I dunno know... I never bragged how my pick of Pacquiao to beat Hoya became a reality... I think I only stick to one point before and after the fight that PAC's speed kills Hoya...

When 2 guys agreed to fight in a certain agreed weight, size is no more a reason or an excuse for defeat... Did you hear defeated guys saying "Oh I lost to a bigger opponent"? None... nada... Size is not a factor or an issue to the warring boxers since they both agreed to fight... It's the fans who use size as a reason (or excuse) why his boy lost...
.

[eagle]

Funny... PAC is bigger stronger guy and carries far more muscle than Morales, Marquez and Barrera ?? I think EM, JMM and MAB will not ever accept that PAC is stronger than them... Faster maybe but not stronger...

More muscles ?? PAC is cheating coz he carries far more muscles than everybody else... LOL

Here's your original statement:

"Pac is naturally bigger than MArquez, Barrera, and Morales, but Pacfans didnt see that as a problem when he fought them...."

PAC is never a bigger guy specially compared to Morales...

BTW, when two guys agreed to fight at a certain agreed weight, there's no more questioning on who is the bigger guy... Both of them believes that he has what it takes to beat the other guy...

Well why are u and evry other Pac fan around going on about how great Pacs achievment of fighting and beating the bigger ODLH is? Acoording to your quote:

"BTW, when two guys agreed to fight at a certain agreed weight, there's no more questioning on who is the bigger guy... Both of them believes that he has what it takes to beat the other guy."

In saying that u say that in fact Pac did not even beat a bigger guy, they were the same size cos they decided to fight at the same weight....

Of course 2 guys can be fighting in same division and one can be far bigger than the other. If Pac fought Paul WIlliams at 147 he'd be far smaller.

I dunno know... I never bragged how my pick of Pacquiao to beat Hoya became a reality... I think I only stick to one point before and after the fight that PAC's speed kills Hoya...

When 2 guys agreed to fight in a certain agreed weight, size is no more a reason or an excuse for defeat... Did you hear defeated guys saying "Oh I lost to a bigger opponent"? None... nada... Size is not a factor or an issue to the warring boxers since they both agreed to fight... It's the fans who use size as a reason (or excuse) why his boy lost...
.

Bullshit. Heaps of fighters and their entourage use size as an excuse after a fight. Hatton did after the PBF fight, Wright did after the Hopkins fight, Margarito did against Santos.

[XaduBoxer]

Well why are u and evry other Pac fan around going on about how great Pacs achievment of fighting and beating the bigger ODLH is? Acoording to your quote:

"BTW, when two guys agreed to fight at a certain agreed weight, there's no more questioning on who is the bigger guy... Both of them believes that he has what it takes to beat the other guy."

In saying that u say that in fact Pac did not even beat a bigger guy, they were the same size cos they decided to fight at the same weight....

Of course 2 guys can be fighting in same division and one can be far bigger than the other. If Pac fought Paul WIlliams at 147 he'd be far smaller.

I dunno know... I never bragged how my pick of Pacquiao to beat Hoya became a reality... I think I only stick to one point before and after the fight that PAC's speed kills Hoya...

When 2 guys agreed to fight in a certain agreed weight, size is no more a reason or an excuse for defeat... Did you hear defeated guys saying "Oh I lost to a bigger opponent"? None... nada... Size is not a factor or an issue to the warring boxers since they both agreed to fight... It's the fans who use size as a reason (or excuse) why his boy lost...
.

Bullshit. Heaps of fighters and their entourage use size as an excuse after a fight. Hatton did after the PBF fight, Wright did after the Hopkins fight, Margarito did against Santos.

Haha I can't imagine Hatton, Winky and Margo saying "Ohh I lost to so and so because he's so bigger than me..." That sounds so gay...
.

[eagle]

I dunno know... I never bragged how my pick of Pacquiao to beat Hoya became a reality... I think I only stick to one point before and after the fight that PAC's speed kills Hoya...

When 2 guys agreed to fight in a certain agreed weight, size is no more a reason or an excuse for defeat... Did you hear defeated guys saying "Oh I lost to a bigger opponent"? None... nada... Size is not a factor or an issue to the warring boxers since they both agreed to fight... It's the fans who use size as a reason (or excuse) why his boy lost...
.

Bullshit. Heaps of fighters and their entourage use size as an excuse after a fight. Hatton did after the PBF fight, Wright did after the Hopkins fight, Margarito did against Santos.

Haha I can't imagine Hatton, Winky and Margo saying "Ohh I lost to so and so because he's so bigger than me..." That sounds so gay...
.

They all did, use the size as an excuse. If u knew anything about boxing u would have heard about it. Pity u live so far up Pacmans ass u dont hear a lot of fight news.

Hatton said 147 wasnt his weight and it gave PBF too much advantage, Winky said 170 was too high in weight for him , and Margo said that the reason he struggled v Santos is because on fight night Daniel weighed 10 pounds more.
Wrong again fanboy. Notice how i get loads of positive rep from knowledgable guys on here and u get fukk all anless its from another pacfan? Saying something to u?

[XaduBoxer]

Bullshit. Heaps of fighters and their entourage use size as an excuse after a fight. Hatton did after the PBF fight, Wright did after the Hopkins fight, Margarito did against Santos.

Haha I can't imagine Hatton, Winky and Margo saying "Ohh I lost to so and so because he's so bigger than me..." That sounds so gay...
.

They all did, use the size as an excuse. If u knew anything about boxing u would have heard about it. Pity u live so far up Pacmans ass u dont hear a lot of fight news.

Hatton said 147 wasnt his weight and it gave PBF too much advantage, Winky said 170 was too high in weight for him , and Margo said that the reason he struggled v Santos is because on fight night Daniel weighed 10 pounds more.
Wrong again fanboy. Notice how i get loads of positive rep from knowledgable guys on here and u get fukk all anless its from another pacfan? Saying something to u?

Huh? They did really said that?? Hatton, Winky and Margarito said they lost because they're so small compared to their respective opponent?? OK I got no problem with that... It's just an acceptance that they made a mistake accepting a fight against a "bigger" guy and they just accepted that they don't have anything else to defeat a "bigger" guy... Props to them for accepting the reality... Most defeated boxers will just say "he lost to the better man" or "he was not himself that night"... Kudos to Hatton, Winky and Margarito for accepting that they lost because their opponent is so much bigger than them...

Saying "you lost because your opponent is much bigger than you" even you knew beforehand that that opponent is really bigger than you is unimaginable for warrior boxers like Hatton, Winky and Margarito... They showed so much class in accepting defeat because the other guy is so big and they made an error before the fight, thinking they have other skills to defeat the "bigger" guy... So much class showed in accepting that they don't have what it takes to defeat the "bigger" opponent...