Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post


Ok ok ...

Like I've said, PAC was even considered the "smaller" guy when he fought MAB, Erik and JMM the first time around. PAC was the one going up in weight in those fights and weigh-in weights also indicated that PAC was "smaller" so you can't just really make a sweeping statement that PAC was always the bigger guy and you can't complain that PAC fans don't see any problems with the size difference as you alleged... I really can't recall MAB or JMM or Erik or anyone in their team complaining that PAC is the bigger boxer... I just can't accept your statement... It's is rather more rational to say that PAC, MAB, JMM and Erik were of the same size... No one among the 4 has that massive size advantage...

BTW, I'm not hating you... I'm just being consistent (or insistent) in attacking your point which I don't agree...
.
The point im making is that Pac is naturally biger than all those guys, that is fact. Pac was much younger and finds it far easier to shed weight than them. I bet Pac weighed hevier or atleast as heavy on fight night as any of those opponents, and that is where u gauge real size not on weigh in weights they prove nothing, except show who can cut weight the best
Let's put this to rest... PAC did not enjoy a massive size advantage over those guys... They just fairly matched size-wise...

And even if one boxer does enjoy a massive size advantage, it's the problem of the "smaller" boxer why he accepted to fight that HUGE boxer... We can't complain about it if both boxers agreed to fight...

Cheers...
.
Thats fine but only if u promise to criticise anyone who uses Pacs size disadvantage as an excuse if he loses to Hatton or PBF. Not saying he will but it is a distinct possibility.