Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

The point im making is that Pac is naturally biger than all those guys, that is fact. Pac was much younger and finds it far easier to shed weight than them. I bet Pac weighed hevier or atleast as heavy on fight night as any of those opponents, and that is where u gauge real size not on weigh in weights they prove nothing, except show who can cut weight the best
Let's put this to rest... PAC did not enjoy a massive size advantage over those guys... They just fairly matched size-wise...

And even if one boxer does enjoy a massive size advantage, it's the problem of the "smaller" boxer why he accepted to fight that HUGE boxer... We can't complain about it if both boxers agreed to fight...

Cheers...
.
Thats fine but only if u promise to criticise anyone who uses Pacs size disadvantage as an excuse if he loses to Hatton or PBF. Not saying he will but it is a distinct possibility.

To make everything fine:

I promise with all my abilities to criticize anyone who uses size disadvantage as an excuse if their boy loses a fight...