
Originally Posted by
RP33
i think between JT rock, ICB, TM and myself among others that this guy has handily gotten rocked in this thread.
it's just funny how he speaks of the "old members" vouching for him, when it's the old members calling him an idiot.
See: delusional
When i said vouch for me i meant in the fact that I ve been saying since joining this forum that shane has the best chance to beat floyd and that any other fighter between 140 147 pbf would beat easily. shane is the only one that give him a serious test.
And most of the old members also thought that hatton would beat floyd...when i said floyd would easily beat him even before they fought. then before the fight came on here and picked floyd in 10....the same way most of the old members were screaming about margarito when i called him a bum that hadn't proven anything..then pick williams to beat him. and said that floyd would make him look like corrales.
And i'm only stating this about shane again, because just four years ago, when i said shane is the only that beat him (pbf) it still stands. evidenced by shane nearly beating cotto, and destroying who for a long time was this forums "he'll beat floyd guy" margarito. Guranteed if floyd signs to fight shane it will be one of the best fights in history and shane could very well kayo floyd or stop him late. And say this too since people get sensitive about these guys like they're being paid by them to be yes men...
Just because I say "SHANE HAS THE BEST SHOT, AND CAN POSSIBLY BEAT FLOYD, DOESN"T MEAN FLOYD CAN"T BEAT HIM",
i'm simply stating that in terms of mental ability, skills, and power. shane will be the best floyd has ever faced and vice versa. But i still would bet on shane....but would'nt be disappointed if either of them lost. can the PBF nut huggers say the same? I doubt it....
Bookmarks