
Originally Posted by
JonesJrMayweather

Originally Posted by
RP33
i think between JT rock, ICB, TM and myself among others that this guy has handily gotten rocked in this thread.
it's just funny how he speaks of the "old members" vouching for him, when it's the old members calling him an idiot.
See: delusional
When i said vouch for me i meant in the fact that I ve been saying since joining this forum that shane has the best chance to beat floyd and that any other fighter between 140 147 pbf would beat easily. shane is the only one that give him a serious test.
And most of the old members also thought that hatton would beat floyd...when i said floyd would easily beat him even before they fought. then before the fight came on here and picked floyd in 10....the same way most of the old members were screaming about margarito when i called him a bum that hadn't proven anything..then pick williams to beat him. and said that floyd would make him look like corrales.
And i'm only stating this about shane again, because just four years ago, when i said shane is the only that beat him (pbf) it still stands. evidenced by shane nearly beating cotto, and destroying who for a long time was this forums "he'll beat floyd guy" margarito. Guranteed if floyd signs to fight shane it will be one of the best fights in history and shane could very well kayo floyd or stop him late. And say this too since people get sensitive about these guys like they're being paid by them to be yes men...
Just because I say "SHANE HAS THE BEST SHOT, AND CAN POSSIBLY BEAT FLOYD, DOESN"T MEAN FLOYD CAN"T BEAT HIM",
i'm simply stating that in terms of mental ability, skills, and power. shane will be the best floyd has ever faced and vice versa. But i still would bet on shane....but would'nt be disappointed if either of them lost. can the PBF nut huggers say the same? I doubt it....
I love that you are defending Shane, and I'm 95% with you, but you gotta keep a little perspective. Taeth, once in a while, makes a good, intelligent point, and even though I said in another thread that Shane has the best chance to beat Floyd, that's a matter really up for debate. From a matchup point of view, Pac is actually the better bet because he's a southpaw with a great straight right and amazing speed. Mayweather/Pac is an awesome matchup to consider.
I've spend a lot of time arguing for Shane having a good chance against Floyd, but that good chance depends on Nazim come up with a plan that will allow Shane to maximize his advantages and take Floyd out of his game. It also depends to some degree on Floyd's willingness to follow the blueprint that has been laid out to beat Mosley...disrupt him with hard jabs. That's not how Floyd has been fighting recently, but in the past he has used the jab effectively. PBF has shown an amazing ability to adapt, and Shane hasn't. That being said, I've haven't seen Shane do much anything different since I've been watching him, and this weekend, he used the jab more, he was more elusive, and he used the clinch effectively. He was a smarter fighter, and maybe the change in trainer can have big effect.
For Shane to beat Floyd, he's going to need a plan that will allow him to land consistently AND avoid getting strafed by counters. He's going to need to fight differently than he has most of his career, and if Floyd can resurrect his best jab and really commit to it, I don't know if Mosley would be able to win anyway, but I also don't know if Floyd throwing crisp, snappy up-jabs from the shell will have the same effect on Mosley as Forrest, Winky, and Cotto throwing hard jabs from a conventional hand position. Even so, Floyd might be so good that he can beat Shane without the jab. This is Floyd Mayweather we're talking about.
I wouldn't favor Shane, but I can him winning. So if you put down $$$, you better be getting better than even money. Floyd is the favorite, no question. If the odds are 2 to 1, I'll think about laying a few bucks on Mosley. If the odds are 4 to 1, I'll be putting down a chunk of cash on him.

Bookmarks