Originally Posted by
C-Lo
I would like to note that I did, once, try to have a debate with you, with FACTS, but all you did was reply to the posters that made fun of you. You completely ignored my post as you did to KEL's in this thread.
Where is your reply to someone who took you seriously?!
Again, I will try one more time because I am in a somewhat of a generous mood. AND TRUST ME! NO ONE IN THIS FORUM HATES YOU MORE THAN I! But this is the last chance, debate it properly or forever feel my NEG REP wrath...
What you said is in bold/underlined while my comment is directly under it:
"I unbiasly we must look at these fighters and compare them."
-You are the absolute last person in the world who can say anything like this. You are completely biased against Pacquiao it's unbelievable.
"Hatton has fought toughter fighters then pacman and has been dominate for many years his only loss was at 147 against the greatest fighter of our generation Floyd mayweather jr."-Hatton's notable fights are Malignaggi, Mayweather, Castillo, Collazo, Tszyu. Pacquiao's notable fights are Barrera, Morales, Marquez (7 fights between the three), De La Hoya. I really don't think there is much debate here, unless you are really biased towards Hatton. Pacquiao has the much better resume.
"Hatton fought luis Collazo as his first step to 147!!!! Collazo is probably one of the most under rated toughest fighters at 147 and Hatton on his first fight faced him!"
-Are you forgetting Pacquiao's first fight at super feather weight was Morales? Also, him moving up in weight to fight Barrera the first time? And moving up TWO WEIGHT CLASSES to fight De La Hoya? Hatton only fought in 140 and 147 his entire career. Pacquiao on the other hand started at 106 and got as high as 147.
"Pacman is a Manufactured protected hype job similar to mike tyson."
-He had 8 total fights against sure short Hall of Famers. That doesn't sound like a so-called "manufactured protected hype job?" Not to mention highly regarded Ledwaba and Larios fell to him as well.
"Under pressure pacman never dealt well, when he was in thailand and couldnt make the weight he faked getting hit by a body shot and just hit the mat because he couldnt deal with the heat and he quit. and got a ko loss.
also when he fought agapito sanchez he wanted to quit he was crying from a low blow but he was hit on the hip. he couldnt deal with agapitos hard shots."
-Agapito Sanchez was fouling him throughout the match. It wasn't from one or two fouls, it was numerous. If you watch the end of the result, Manny was pissed they didn't let him continue.
Saying Pacquiao doesn't deal with pressure is absurd. Each fight he carries a nation on his shoulders and to excell rather than fold under that pressure with his level of competition is a feat.
"hatton doesnt quit he fights like a MEXICAN not pacquaio"
-You are out of your mind! He went to war with Morales and Marquez. Pacquiao had those two losses early in his career but since then, when has he ever quit?
"When roach was offered a Valero fight, a soto fight, a guzman fight for pacman he rejected those guys...Roach said Dangerous fight with little reward HAHAH"
-If you're supposedly making an unbiased post, why does this quote end in "HAHAH?" Either way, Valero, Soto, and Guzman posses no mainstream audience. Pacquiao fights the big names for big money. Why fight a small name for small money? Plus, Valero, Soto, and Guzman need to fight bigger names before they get a crack at the biggest name. That's just the way it goes.
OK Moono, let's see what you got? Properly defend your statements after me trying to disprove you. If not, if you ignore this or make a childish reply, you will completely be negged repped by me each time I possibly can.
Thanks: 
Likes: 
Dislikes: 
Re: HATTON is better then PACMAN hear me out! facts inside.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks