Plaster Vs. Steriods

[Chino]

But you are clearly missing the point, that in that situation there is some thing to gain. Why else would you use the term 'gold digger'

I used that term for those girls who falsely accuse guys of rape to get some money. Just like Deseree Washington with Mike Tyson, that girl that accused Kobe Bryant, Bobby Bonilla, and bunch of other celebrities. These guys either go to jail like Mike Tyson or even though they may be found innocent, their reputation is ruined. A girl like that is a golddigger slut. Just used it as an example of someone who ruins someone's reputation regardless of them coming out innocent. What happens to the accuser? Nothing. What happens to the accused? A lot .

Here's a thought. If it bothers you that others speculate, so much that you feel the need to call them 'similar to slutty golddigging whores' ...maybe don't fuel the fire by continuing on about it

Dude, you are not getting the example. Fine, let's erase the word "golddigger" and keep it down to "slutty accusing whore" if you want. When I said "goldigger" I was not directing that to ANYBODY in here or in boxing. I was just using that word to illustrate what a false accuser is. Is it clear now?

And being a hypocrite in the process by telling others to wait and see, but yet keep piping up in threads with an opinion on it.

Go back to what I first posted mentioning BOTH SIDES OF THE COIN, sheesh! And now you call me a hypocrite. I'll repeat it again: If Margarito comes out innocent, how bad, his reputation is ruined. It will be hard for the casual fan to not question Margarito's victories from here on. THEN AGAIN, Nazim has all the rights to ask what goes on in the opponent's corner...Do you understand now?

[Youngblood]

Actually no...not clear at all. You can break it down 6 ways from Sunday, and it is what it is. Sounds like you have an issue with women and accusations of rape.

And yes, I do call you a hypocrite.

[Chino]

Actually no...not clear at all. You can break it down 6 ways from Sunday, and it is what it is. Sounds like you have an issue with women and accusations of rape.

And now the topic is changing to rape? Oh man. I broke it down and you still didn't get it.

1.Someone accuses a person of something.
2.It all comes out to be false.
3.The accuser prances his/her way to freedom. Nothing happens to him/her.
4.The accused has his reputation ruined regardless of being found innocent.

As easy as that.

[Youngblood]

Actually no...not clear at all. You can break it down 6 ways from Sunday, and it is what it is. Sounds like you have an issue with women and accusations of rape.

And now the topic is changing to rape? Oh man. I broke it down and you still didn't get it.

1.Someone accuses a person of something.
2.It all comes out to be false.
3.The accuser prances his/her way to freedom. Nothing happens to him/her.
4.The accused has his reputation ruined regardless of being found innocent.

As easy as that.

Only because you are maybe assuming he is innocent in this scenario.

And for the record, you switched the topic to rape. Care to explain why?

[Chino]

Actually no...not clear at all. You can break it down 6 ways from Sunday, and it is what it is. Sounds like you have an issue with women and accusations of rape.

And now the topic is changing to rape? Oh man. I broke it down and you still didn't get it.

1.Someone accuses a person of something.
2.It all comes out to be false.
3.The accuser prances his/her way to freedom. Nothing happens to him/her.
4.The accused has his reputation ruined regardless of being found innocent.

As easy as that.

Only because you are maybe assuming he is innocent in this scenario.

And for the record, you switched the topic to rape. Care to explain why?

Nope, I don't assume he's innocent. That is why I am saying that Nazim has every right to check. In other topics I have said that I would be as dissapointed as anybody if he was found guilty.

Rape topic? *sigh* We can use any other topic if you want but that is the first one that came to mind when it comes to damaging someone's image/reputation. Let me explain again. Used that example because if a guy is falsely accused and the court finds him innocent, his reputation is damaged regardless of him being innocent. But what happens to the girl? NOTHING. Ok, now, if Margarito is found innocent of all this, it doesn't matter, his reputation will be damaged anyways (just like the example I used with the falsely accused guy). As of Nazim, he will be just fine, he was just "doing his job" which is TOTALLY FINE! any corner would want to make sure things are done right.

That is why I used that example. Is it that complicated for you? Seems like we are going around circles.

[Youngblood]

[
That is why I used that example. Is it that complicated for you? Seems like we are going around circles.

It's not complicated for me at all. You called the people questioning his guilt, debating it 'like those goldigging slutty whores who falsely accuse rich men of rape '. and I pointed out the flaw in your arguement. Which is...no one wins anything here. It's not the first place I'd go for anything...

So basically you are attacking people who may not agree with you. And you also want them to sit and not speculate (as supported by you suggesting Danny should)...the whole while as you add your opinion.

And that, my friend, is hypocrisy.

So I don't really have any more to add on the matter, with you. Other then, don't throw stones and expect not to catch a few.

[Chino]

You clearly didn't understand my point. Took the word "goldigging" out and even the whole rape example just in case and numbered them from 1 to 4 for you just to show that the accuser doesn't end as bad as the accused. As simple as that. And I went on to say that Nazim shouldn't be seen as the villain either (showing both sides of the coin).

So basically you are attacking people who may not agree with you

Nope, because I am showing both sides of the coin. Attacking someone who disagrees with me would be to call them hypocrite, use profanity, etc. I try not to do that with you or any other thread that I remember. I have said that I would be as dissapointed as anybody if Margarito was found guilty and also that Nazim has every right to check Margarito. I am not accusing Nazim nor Margarito. That's how I try to predict fights as well, leaving it neutral.

[Onix]

Actually no...not clear at all. You can break it down 6 ways from Sunday, and it is what it is. Sounds like you have an issue with women and accusations of rape.

And now the topic is changing to rape? Oh man. I broke it down and you still didn't get it.

1.Someone accuses a person of something.
2.It all comes out to be false.
3.The accuser prances his/her way to freedom. Nothing happens to him/her.
4.The accused has his reputation ruined regardless of being found innocent.

As easy as that.

Only because you are maybe assuming he is innocent in this scenario.

And for the record, you switched the topic to rape. Care to explain why?

Arent we supposed to assume someone is innocent until proven guilty?

[Youngblood]

Chino...i'm not looking for ways around anything. You are looking for ways around having to explain your fascination with hating women and rape.

Innocent till proven guilty. Onix? Seriously. After going after Mosely in defence of Margarito in multiple threads. Surely you jest. And watch too much tv.

[DC Amateur Boxing]

Arent we supposed to assume someone is innocent until proven guilty?

Yes, but in this case he admitted he may have taken them, but he is saying he didn't do it knowingly. He can't really say what exactly he was taking, only what they told him - so he cannot say 100% that he didn't because they were giving him 'something'.

[X]

They are not admissible in court in Europe or the UK, Africa, the Middle east, India, Australia, New Zealand or most of Asia.

[DC Amateur Boxing]

Why is no one mentioning the fact that the Nevada State Athletic Commission said that Shane passed a polygraph when questioned about "knowingly" using steroids? He didn't know and he passed a poly. . .and signed a statement for the NSAC saying the same thing. According to his statement, Mosley said he told BALCO president Victor Conte he didn't want to take any banned substances because he knew Fernando Vargas had been suspended for nine months and fined $100,000 in 2002 after testing positive for steroids following his match against De La Hoya.

[Chino]

Why is no one mentioning the fact that the Nevada State Athletic Commission said that Shane passed a polygraph when questioned about "knowingly" using steroids? He didn't know and he passed a poly. . .and signed a statement for the NSAC saying the same thing. According to his statement, Mosley said he told BALCO president Victor Conte he didn't want to take any banned substances because he knew Fernando Vargas had been suspended for nine months and fined $100,000 in 2002 after testing positive for steroids following his match against De La Hoya.

What's up DC
Do you have the link to that?

[DC Amateur Boxing]

Why is no one mentioning the fact that the Nevada State Athletic Commission said that Shane passed a polygraph when questioned about "knowingly" using steroids? He didn't know and he passed a poly. . .and signed a statement for the NSAC saying the same thing. According to his statement, Mosley said he told BALCO president Victor Conte he didn't want to take any banned substances because he knew Fernando Vargas had been suspended for nine months and fined $100,000 in 2002 after testing positive for steroids following his match against De La Hoya.

What's up DC
Do you have the link to that?

Mosley Takes Steps to Protect Image - Los Angeles Times
Article detailing some of Shane's statement.

Mosley admits he unknowingly took BALCO steroids - Boxing - ESPN
More details after Conte starts spouting off again. Shane said he paid with check, which doesn't seem logical if he knew what he was getting.

Conte says Mosley knew of steroids - Los Angeles Times
Conte again. . .exactly at the same time he announced his book deal. He says Shane paid with cash. Shane sues for defamation - not really what you do if you are lying (Marion came clean and never once sued Conte which really was weird when they were going back and forth in the media. It smelled fishy to me then).

[awdleyfuturehalloffamer]

Lie detectors are very inaccurate, that's why they are inadmissable in court. Very unreliable.