Plaster Vs. Steriods

[Andre]

And if he had is found innocent? look at the black mark thats left on his record regardless.

Sad but true .
It's like those goldigging slutty whores who falsely accuse rich men of rape and when these men are found innocent. These guys' reputation is already damaged FOR EVER. They loose their jobs, friends, etc. While the false accusing bitch prances her way out of the court and looks for another victim to make her rich.

As for Nazim, he has every right to question what's going on in the other corner and if Margarito didn't have anything then let it be.

I'm sorry, but this is a fairly poor analysis IMO.

And this is the court of public opinion. And the point is simple, and especially in my reply. When people like Onix try to attack Mosely in defence of Margo, if causes people like myself to draw a line and make statements one way or another.

So basically, if you can't be objective and just quietly wait for the full truth to come out, then don't biatch about what those who may not feel the same as you...have to say.

In other words, you can't be walking around flapping your lips on the topic, and expect others to be quiet and not express opinion ...just because they don't agree with you.

Imagine prior to testing how many people would of fought on cocaine.They could kill you and themselves while they were at it, but I bet we'd all be shocked to find out all the world time greats in many sports as well as music who excelled in those times with that help.

Regarding plaster in wraps you could easily say it was talc powder that dried up and set.You would think if they were going to try and put plaster into layers of wraps they would mix talcum powder into it so if caught and tested they had a built in question mark to confuse the authorites.

Something weird is going on you would think they'd know exactly what was in them by now.

[awdleyfuturehalloffamer]

Polygraph evidence is presently inadmissible in Canada and many jurisdictions of the United States. One of the major reasons for its exclusion lies in the belief (held by members of the judiciary) that jurors would accept such evidence without question due to its technical/scientific nature. The question of such blind acceptance was examined in two experiments on the influence of polygraph evidence on people's judgements of guilt. A second question that was also raised was whether a caution on the limitations of the polygraph would be effective in reducing people's weighting of such evidence. Although polygraph evidence was expected to exert some influence over judgements of guilt, it was not expected to be so great as to result in blind acceptance

SpringerLink - Journal Article

[Chino]

Imagine prior to testing how many people would of fought on cocaine.They could kill you and themselves while they were at it, but I bet we'd all be shocked to find out all the world time greats in many sports as well as music who excelled in those times with that help.

I know, it’s a bit sad. I was talking to a friend about how sports now are not so much about how fast I run against you but about how fast I run, how good my "enhancers" are vs yours, how fast my super sonic speed suit is vs yours, etc.

Something weird is going on you would think they'd know exactly what was in them by now

Still waiting, still waiting.

[DC Amateur Boxing]

Polygraph evidence is presently inadmissible in Canada and many jurisdictions of the United States. One of the major reasons for its exclusion lies in the belief (held by members of the judiciary) that jurors would accept such evidence without question due to its technical/scientific nature. The question of such blind acceptance was examined in two experiments on the influence of polygraph evidence on people's judgements of guilt. A second question that was also raised was whether a caution on the limitations of the polygraph would be effective in reducing people's weighting of such evidence. Although polygraph evidence was expected to exert some influence over judgements of guilt, it was not expected to be so great as to result in blind acceptance

SpringerLink - Journal Article

Don't really know what the point is here, but the fact remains that polygraphs have sent people back to jail and polygraphs have exonerated people in the United States and in other countries. You can't argue with facts, man. Fact: Man sex offenders in the US must take routine polygraph tests and some are violated and sent to prison for failing them.Law.com - 2nd Circuit Approves Post-Release Use of Polygraph In the UK, they are required in some cases too Offender Management Act 2007 (c. 21) BTW, your law journal link is research and an empirical (relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory) study of a hypothesis (assumption). It is NOT fact of law or the result of an actual adjudicated case - so it might as well be from something you saw in a movie. Plus you should probably read the full text and not just the abstract.

[boozeboxer]

Overwhelming case law and the evidentiary rules excludes the use of polygraph tests because of the unreliablity they produce and the magic effect they have on a jury...

[deadlypete]

man margairito could have had concrete in his gloves but the sugar still would have knocked his arse out....sugar shane just destroyed the tornado and showed he was just a puff on harmless wind against him

[boozeboxer]

man margairito could have had concrete in his gloves but the sugar still would have knocked his arse out....sugar shane just destroyed the tornado and showed he was just a puff on harmless wind against him

that's a sound post that