Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 131

Thread: Beatles or Stones?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post

    enlighten me. When did the Beatles do Country and Western? And did they ever do a straight ahead twelve bar blues?

    They weren't too far behind with the insrumentation and psychedelia (Their Satanic Majesties Request ), they just didn't stick with it.
    Act Naturally was a straight C&W song that became a C&W hit by a different artist
    ok, that qualifies, but I prefer the Stones country: Dead Flowers, Girl with Faraway Eyes.

    Still waitin on that Beatles 12 bar blues though.
    Of course Id like to even hear the Stones doing proper big band,because "Your Mother Should Know" was allmost perfect fpr the style.
    And the most of amazing thing about the Beatles is they did it in such a short time frame. Thats whats allways amazed me about the Clash as well

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2812
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Act Naturally was a straight C&W song that became a C&W hit by a different artist
    ok, that qualifies, but I prefer the Stones country: Dead Flowers, Girl with Faraway Eyes.

    Still waitin on that Beatles 12 bar blues though.
    Of course Id like to even hear the Stones doing proper big band,because "Your Mother Should Know" was allmost perfect fpr the style.
    And the most of amazing thing about the Beatles is they did it in such a short time frame. Thats whats allways amazed me about the Clash as well
    Rock and Roll.

    http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=ResLOFXJAhA

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Brah,thats passable blue grass
    I'll live by this

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr4Mu...eature=related

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2812
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    yeah, but that's not a beatles or a stones song that she's singing. And Townes van Zandt, the artist in my video, is not really known as a bluegrass guy, but he is a great songwriter.

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    OK I'll show you Rolling Stones versitility

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxHE876o3ME

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVEdYYMlOJ4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ki2daAPp_k

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex1nxuM1fU8

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MejtR81RzCo

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn6kHgA-eRE

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJMnES7WoT4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx07A9LWBJA

    The Rolling Stones simply rocked harder than The Beatles ever did...I like The Beatles and all but no way they top the stones.


    And Elvis beats them all....he was just one dude

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    The Stones did rock harder. The Beatles were artist and could rock and play some of the best love songs the world has ever known. They were much deeper than the Stones. As I said before the Stones of 1964 are the Stones of 2009.
    Last edited by mrbig1; 02-01-2009 at 06:56 PM.

  7. #7
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    The Stones did rock harder. The Beatles were artist and could rock and play some of the best love songs the world has ever known. They were much deeper than the Stones. As I said before the Stones of 1964 are the Stones of 2009.
    I guess we're just going to have to disagree....The Stones had a different vibe, they weren't as poppy as The Beatles either

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tonsil Stones (kinda gross)
    By TheChosenOne in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 12:17 PM
  2. BEATLES FANS - CHECK DIS OUT!!!
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 04:44 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 10:14 PM
  4. Beatles..Yellow Submarine-full film here
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-15-2007, 09:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing