Beatles or Stones?

[mrbig1]

The Stones did rock harder. The Beatles were artist and could rock and play some of the best love songs the world has ever known. They were much deeper than the Stones. As I said before the Stones of 1964 are the Stones of 2009.

[El Kabong]

The Stones did rock harder. The Beatles were artist and could rock and play some of the best love songs the world has ever known. They were much deeper than the Stones. As I said before the Stones of 1964 are the Stones of 2009.

I guess we're just going to have to disagree....The Stones had a different vibe, they weren't as poppy as The Beatles either

[mrbig1]

The Stones did rock harder. The Beatles were artist and could rock and play some of the best love songs the world has ever known. They were much deeper than the Stones. As I said before the Stones of 1964 are the Stones of 2009.

I guess we're just going to have to disagree....The Stones had a different vibe, they weren't as poppy as The Beatles either

That's true about the early Beatles. Unlike the Stones they were able to grow up and change. The Album Meet the Beatles of 1964 was lightyears from the white album or sgt. pepper. The times didn't change them they change the times and the world.

[rialex]

eraserheads... no kidding aside, i like the beatles more. they will never get out of style