
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer

Originally Posted by
Manuel "Chubby" Medina
Why do people Keep saying that What Pacman did to Oscar De la Hoya was incredible?

Oscar didnt fight back, a punching bag would of fought more because unlike Oscar the punching bag SWINGS BACK.
Someone answer me.
That's the normal reaction of people who thought PAC will lose to Hoya but for those of us who picked PAC to defeat Hoya, picking PAC over Hatton is a much easier decision to make...
Talking about pre-fight conditions, Hatton definitely is the lesser threat compared to Hoya... In the Hoya fight, PAC is a 2 to 1 underdog but now in the Hatton fight, PAC is the 2 to 1 FAVORITE... BIG pre-fight difference...

I said it before and ill say it again
IF Oscar fights it will be a good fight.
I had no prefference.-if thats how you spell it.
BUT Oscar
DIDNT fight back.So of course Pacman won.
Anybody can hit a punchin bag, I dont get as much credit as Pacman did for doin juzz that on that fight.
My question was...
Why do people think Pacman beating Oscar de la hoya was so incredible is Oscar didnt fight back?
Any1 can beat someone who doesnt fight back, henceforth my punchin bag metaphor.

Bookmarks