Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post



so your admitting there was no more than a punch or two between them in each and every round but that holyfield deserved to take all 12 of them

im seriously starting to ponder whether we have eugene williams in our midst
A two punch difference is a 40% difference when there is only five punches thrown you knuckle head.
perhaps I am missing something, but here goes...

5 total punches with three by Holyfield means two by Valuev, right?

3+2 = 5 right?

here's the tough part: 3-2=1. So there is a one punch difference between the fighters.

Also 3 is 50% bigger than 2. right? So in fact what we have is a one punch 50% difference between the fighters, not a two punch 40% difference.

I knew I went to school for something.

p.s. a two punch difference with 5 total punches is impossible


uppercuts just trying to dig himself out of a hole thats just too big for him, please ignore him.

The kind of guy that takes the opinion of broadsheet journalists looking to fill a page with a bit of controversy way too seriously rather than his own opinion.

If you think evander won the fight thats cool, it was a very close fight

if however you think he won all 12rounds you clearly know nothing about boxing!!!!!!!!!!!!