WBA Holyfield Decision?

[HattonTheHammer]

perhaps I am missing something, but here goes...

5 total punches with three by Holyfield means two by Valuev, right?

3+2 = 5 right?

here's the tough part: 3-2=1. So there is a one punch difference between the fighters.

Also 3 is 50% bigger than 2. right? So in fact what we have is a one punch 50% difference between the fighters, not a two punch 40% difference.

I knew I went to school for something.

p.s. a two punch difference with 5 total punches is impossible

uppercuts just trying to dig himself out of a hole thats just too big for him, please ignore him.

The kind of guy that takes the opinion of broadsheet journalists looking to fill a page with a bit of controversy way too seriously rather than his own opinion.

If you think evander won the fight thats cool, it was a very close fight

if however you think he won all 12rounds you clearly know nothing about boxing!!!!!!!!!!!!

I bet if a "prime tyson" was the judge he would get it right.

oh way to contradict me by bringing up an entirely different argument on another thread and bringing it onto here.

Not only does that give me the impression youve accepted the "holyfield won all 12rounds" was just plain silly but that your pety enough to resort to childish remarks like that