
Originally Posted by
brucelee
Bilbo: As to the level of kasparov in that game, I am no longer sure. What I'm sure is, I won against kasparov in that game.
The computer may seem to have played bad but if you take a deeper look at it, it was simply answering to my moves based on its programming. That's why computers can be defeated, not easily though but they can be defeated.
Anyway, I can't control the computer if he chooses to do the e5. I've been playing Sicilian defense and it is not really that impregnable.
Edit: I don't have a chessboard right now. I can't visually my the computer answered 7. ...... gxf6
I have analyzed the game before and if my memory doesn't fail me, capturing it using Q is not a good move.
Its a very well known schoolboy opening you are playing Bruce, 7.gxf6 is simply the wrong move. Qxf6 is the book move and the computer at its highest level would play the book move.
You say a computer can be defeated and its not that impregnable but chessmaster at its highest level is practically impregnable. It would be perfect tactically, and never make any combinational errors, it would have a grandmaster level opening reportiore with an opening book covering hundreds of thousands of moves and positions and you'd have to be an exceptionally good player to defeat it.
The Kasparov you were playing already went wrong as early as
7.gxf6 not quite a patzer move but positionally a big mistake. Queen takes is the book move followed by 8.Nd5 then back to Qd8.
I'll have a look at the rest of the game in a bit, but already I can see you were playing against a very low strength program.
Not wishing to detract from your win of course but to claim to defeat a virtual model of the worlds greatest player is a pretty big claim to make
Bookmarks