Originally Posted by
eagle
Settle mate. No one is doubting his ability as an amature, or the fact he should do well as a pro. I for one was just pointing out its a tad early to compare him to Jones and Whitaker.
As for Mares he was only 18 when Rigondeaux beat him, Gulllermo was 23.
Sorry, I have to jump on the bandwagon. Watching an early (I did say early) Lara and Gamboa - knowing that Rigo is admittedly ten times better than those guys - I can't wait to see him in action as a pro. Against anyone, I don't care who. Only time will tell, but I'd put my money on him to be a great one. I know it's early, but "they" said that about Tyson at 15!!!
Thanks: 
Likes: 
Dislikes: 
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux has defected, turrning pro
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks