
Originally Posted by
Bilbo

Originally Posted by
CGM
I never said Black's position was good Bilbo, I was just challenging some of your assertions about certain moves and positions, such as ...
Nd5 does nothing at all if black knows the proper defense, its an extremely common chess line known to give white no advantage against a proper defense
How can 9.Nd5 be extremly common when the position after 8...Be6 rarely occurs? 7...gxf6 changes the essential nature of the position, and traditional assessments of the move Nd5 for white no longer apply.
I'm not talking about Nd5 after gxf6 I'm talking about the mainline after 7.Qxf6. Bruce was saying Qxf6 is the wrong move because white can follow up with 8.Nd5. I was just saying it's long been known to be inoffensive if black knows the main line.
This was my comment regarding 7. .... Qxf6
Using 7.... Qxf6 is not advisable because when Nc3 goes to d5, the Black queen will be forced to go back to d8. Besides, it's too early to use the queen. IMO.
In my point of view and explaining the move of the computer, Qxf6 may not be advisable. I did not say it was wrong. The canal variation of giuoco piano suggests Qxf6. The use of Qx6 is okay and is being used by grandmasters but in my humble opinion, black loses 2 moves with that move.
I was just explaining that the computer answered differently through 7.... gxf6 and it is without any reason.
It was not a schoolboy's move as you have claimed it is.
For the record, I won against the computer because it chooses gxf6 but it is without merit. I won because after the 17th move, I saw already a win. By the 21st move, I know I will win after 5 moves.
You were quick to judge and you repetitively insulted my game with the computer that's why I have to defend the computer's move.
For the record, I did set the computer's level to Kasparov and whether its moves are questionable or not, that I can not say for sure. Personally, I don't see any problem with those moves.
Just like what I've told you before, my abilities and knowledge in chess have already eroded because of inactivity. I haven't played chess for years and that could explain my lack of deeper understanding.
I was simply presenting a game I've won against a computer when I was still good(not excellent!) in chess.
Peace.
Bookmarks