Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 15 of 1212

Thread: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Oakland, California, USA
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

    There is no way his arms are 5 inches shorter than his shoulder width. No way in hell. You measurements are wrong, dead wrong. Fuck admit fault for once in your life!
    I'll do the math for you:

    Pac has 67" reach, That from finger tips to finger tips.
    Pac has 25" arms but that's from arm pit to Knuckles, It doesn't include the lenght of the middle finger which aprox about 2" +/-.
    Pac's Shoulder to shoulder then will be measured as 67-25-25=17, 17"- 4"(fingertips X2)=approx 13" wide at the shoulder.

    Hatton will be like:
    65"-20-20=25, 25-4"=21" wide at the shoulder. Compared to Pac's 13

    HMM...13" looks really to short for Pac at the shoulder. Maybe this measurement was when Pac was at 122, maybe his bone structure was stretched by the weight gain. Well I did my best, At the shoulder Hatton is 21" wide compared to Pac' 13". That's 8" difference. Maybe Pac Reach really was 69+" now.
    U idiot.
    I was Good in Math I swear!! How about make your own computations??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1680
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    I'll do the math for you:

    Pac has 67" reach, That from finger tips to finger tips.
    Pac has 25" arms but that's from arm pit to Knuckles, It doesn't include the lenght of the middle finger which aprox about 2" +/-.
    Pac's Shoulder to shoulder then will be measured as 67-25-25=17, 17"- 4"(fingertips X2)=approx 13" wide at the shoulder.

    Hatton will be like:
    65"-20-20=25, 25-4"=21" wide at the shoulder. Compared to Pac's 13

    HMM...13" looks really to short for Pac at the shoulder. Maybe this measurement was when Pac was at 122, maybe his bone structure was stretched by the weight gain. Well I did my best, At the shoulder Hatton is 21" wide compared to Pac' 13". That's 8" difference. Maybe Pac Reach really was 69+" now.
    U idiot.
    I was Good in Math I swear!! How about make your own computations??
    So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs??
    And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!

    Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Oakland, California, USA
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

    U idiot.
    I was Good in Math I swear!! How about make your own computations??
    So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs??
    And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!

    Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!
    Then do your math?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1680
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    I was Good in Math I swear!! How about make your own computations??
    So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs??
    And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!

    Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!
    Then do your math?
    I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
    That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.

  5. #5
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

    So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs??
    And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!

    Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!
    Then do your math?
    I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
    That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.
    Try to review your HBO tapes where PAC and Hatton were involved. Usually they show you a tale of the tape before the fight begins. It's clearly noted there, PAC's arm length (from armpit to tip of knuckles) is 25" and that of Hatton is 20"... That's where I get my figures...
    .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1680
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacdbest2 View Post

    Then do your math?
    I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
    That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.
    Try to review your HBO tapes where PAC and Hatton were involved. Usually they show you a tale of the tape before the fight begins. It's clearly noted there, PAC's arm length (from armpit to tip of knuckles) is 25" and that of Hatton is 20"... That's where I get my figures...
    .
    Are u seriously trying to tell me that the figures are correct. Do u honestly believe them Hatton is no way 8 inches wider across the shoulders than Pac. That is fact. Hattons arms are in no way shorter than his shoulder width, no ones are. Pacs arms are not 5 full inches longer than Ricky's. Wherever u got these 'facts' from they are wrong.

  7. #7
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

    I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
    That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.
    Try to review your HBO tapes where PAC and Hatton were involved. Usually they show you a tale of the tape before the fight begins. It's clearly noted there, PAC's arm length (from armpit to tip of knuckles) is 25" and that of Hatton is 20"... That's where I get my figures...
    .
    Are u seriously trying to tell me that the figures are correct. Do u honestly believe them Hatton is no way 8 inches wider across the shoulders than Pac. That is fact. Hattons arms are in no way shorter than his shoulder width, no ones are. Pacs arms are not 5 full inches longer than Ricky's. Wherever u got these 'facts' from they are wrong.
    Here it is... If you can't accept Hatton's arm length is only 20", you better write a protest letter to HBO...


    .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-02-2007, 08:03 PM
  2. lol me beating my mate up !
    By Tam Seddon in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-29-2007, 03:58 AM
  3. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-08-2007, 12:38 AM
  4. Is Oscar in for a beating?
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-07-2006, 04:49 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing