Question on Scoring

[CutMeMick]

If this is true, as most everyone has said (and of course this is better than having the judges keep their scorecards till the end of the fight)....... then WHY does it sometimes takes so long to get the decision? Does it really take up to 5 minutes to add 10 points to one fighter's score and 9 or 8 to the other?



And is it any wonder people become all sorts of suspicious when it takes 5-10 minutes to get the decision?

Def. and then like I said they have added the points wrong and announced the wrong winner.
Then they add the totals again and get the right winner.

LOL.... it's like Moe, Larry and Curly out there.

As the times have passed lot's has changed in the way it's handled.
As disscused recently in a thread I made.

In Harada vs. Famechon I, the ref. Pep changed his original scorecard at the end of the fight awarding Fammo a narrow win over Harada.

You should see what they did to Armando Muniz vs. Jose Napoles in Mexico. Well actually I should say what Jose Sulaiman (WBC) did to Muniz.
They robbed him of a win over Napoles it was robbery in broad daylight.
Napoles unable to continue on cuts and IMO losing the fight on points the ref. along with Jose Sulaiman talk then Jose walks around and gathers up with the judges keep in mind Jose is from the org. not the commision after several minutes it is decided that they will go to the cards BUT if Napoles was unable to continue from cuts cause by a punch then it should be a TKO win for Muniz. Instead it was said that the punches were cause by head butts thus sending the fight to the judges.

The judges scored the fight for Napoles awarding him a Tech. Dec.
But you gotta see how Sulaiman man huddles up with the judges you can almost hear him say here's how the fights gonna go...