
Originally Posted by
eagle
Are u brain dead? I just wrote that Pac is the worst P4P #1 fighter, so yes i see him as #1. My point is that he is the worst #1 ever and that is a bad sign for boxing. Read the thread moron. Name me a former P4P #1 that is worse?
Even PAC admitted that he's not a great boxer... He's only a good boxer that happens to beat great boxers... And in most of his post-fight interviews, he humbly said that he's just lucky...
It's not PAC's fault he's been installed at the no. 1 P4P boxer throne... He didn't buy that position... But to say that it's sad day for boxing having PAc at that position is totally ridiculous... PAC had done a lot for boxing... He bring excitement to the sport... He's one of the most exciting boxers around...
.
Bookmarks