Kid thunder

[Tilt A Whirl]

Even so he still has more experience then most everyone he fought. Including their amateur records, toughman and pro. Can you just admit it was an incorrect statement?

Let's look at his last 4 fights.

McClure. 0-4 4 KOs Did he have more experience? This was Andrews 17th pro fight. His 5th year as a professional boxer.

David Dumas. 2-0. Did he have more experience? This was Andrws 16th pro fight.

Charlie Zelenoff. LOL Charlie. Well aside from being a street fighter of epic proportions and all around russian badass, I think it is safe to say he didn't have much experience. Andrew's 15th fight.

Blaine Burke. 1-3. his only win, Hartley. This was Andrews 14th pro fight.

Are you starting to get the picture? So can you just admit he often has more experience, and not in fact less? Can you admit you made an incorrect statement? Like once. ever?

Dumas,I didnt have him for
Burke,I didnt even know him for
Everybody says at worst it should have been a draw,and I do mean at worst considering it was McClures home town
Do you ever check your facts,ever?
Getting tossed in the ring with no training against a better fighter,doesnt exactly count as experience,unless you count have your head pounded in as experience. I guess it is an experience,but not one youd like to repeat

[Youngblood]

Even so he still has more experience then most everyone he fought. Including their amateur records, toughman and pro. Can you just admit it was an incorrect statement?

Let's look at his last 4 fights.

McClure. 0-4 4 KOs Did he have more experience? This was Andrews 17th pro fight. His 5th year as a professional boxer.

David Dumas. 2-0. Did he have more experience? This was Andrws 16th pro fight.

Charlie Zelenoff. LOL Charlie. Well aside from being a street fighter of epic proportions and all around russian badass, I think it is safe to say he didn't have much experience. Andrew's 15th fight.

Blaine Burke. 1-3. his only win, Hartley. This was Andrews 14th pro fight.

Are you starting to get the picture? So can you just admit he often has more experience, and not in fact less? Can you admit you made an incorrect statement? Like once. ever?

Dumas,I didnt have him for
Burke,I didnt even know him for
Everybody says at worst it should have been a draw,and I do mean at worst considering it was McClures home town
Do you ever check your facts,ever?

yes I do check my facts. it is facts I used to call out your for a more pleasant saying, umm, made up stuff.

You stated exactly

I understand his discomfort on the inside,he's used to being the smaller and more inexperienced guy.

To which I answered that is not true. With you know. Facts.

lol

[Tilt A Whirl]

Even so he still has more experience then most everyone he fought. Including their amateur records, toughman and pro. Can you just admit it was an incorrect statement?

Let's look at his last 4 fights.

McClure. 0-4 4 KOs Did he have more experience? This was Andrews 17th pro fight. His 5th year as a professional boxer.

David Dumas. 2-0. Did he have more experience? This was Andrws 16th pro fight.

Charlie Zelenoff. LOL Charlie. Well aside from being a street fighter of epic proportions and all around russian badass, I think it is safe to say he didn't have much experience. Andrew's 15th fight.

Blaine Burke. 1-3. his only win, Hartley. This was Andrews 14th pro fight.

Are you starting to get the picture? So can you just admit he often has more experience, and not in fact less? Can you admit you made an incorrect statement? Like once. ever?

Dumas,I didnt have him for
Burke,I didnt even know him for
Everybody says at worst it should have been a draw,and I do mean at worst considering it was McClures home town
Do you ever check your facts,ever?

yes I do check my facts. it is facts I used to call out your for a more pleasant saying, umm, made up stuff.

You stated exactly

I understand his discomfort on the inside,he's used to being the smaller and more inexperienced guy.

To which I answered that is not true. With you know. Facts.

lol

Apparantly you dont
Was he the more or less experienced guy against Oison Fagan?
Its almost like something like that would create bad habits that need to be broken.
I mean Fagan was only an amatuer champion and Andrew had no amateur backround at all.
I mean that might be something that would throw you off your game plan. If they had bothered to give him a game plan.
Dig a little deeper next time before you mouth off.

[Youngblood]

Listen, quoting one fighter hardly makes your point.

It just further proves that you have no interest in dealing with truth. It isn't a dig against Andrew, he does what he does. But let's face it, he isn't facing more experienced people. Simple. If you read my statement (if you can even read) you'd see how I broke it down in simple terms for you.

Now ask yourself why it is that person after person calls you on the things you say. I am guessing somewhere in your mind you figure it is because every other person is wrong, and you are correct. Again and again, over and over, everyone is wrong, but you are right. Do you know what the odds are for that? Given the many subjects and number of different people?

Even in the face of facts, logic, reason, you still go on...unable to EVER admit a slip up or incorrect statement. If it isn't a mental illness, it is surely the greatest case of denial in the history of human existance.

This is what any arguement or debate IMO breaks down to with you. I am no longer going to try to talk to you, for it is pointless. But when I get in these situations I will just post this video clip of the degradation of an arguement, to save us all a lot of time and finger tip wear.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znowCx_y7nU

good day, sir.

[Tilt A Whirl]

Listen, quoting one fighter hardly makes your point.

It just further proves that you have no interest in dealing with truth. It isn't a dig against Andrew, he does what he does. But let's face it, he isn't facing more experienced people. Simple. If you read my statement (if you can even read) you'd see how I broke it down in simple terms for you.

Now ask yourself why it is that person after person calls you on the things you say. I am guessing somewhere in your mind you figure it is because every other person is wrong, and you are correct. Again and again, over and over, everyone is wrong, but you are right. Do you know what the odds are for that? Given the many subjects and number of different people?

Even in the face of facts, logic, reason, you still go on...unable to EVER admit a slip up or incorrect statement. If it isn't a mental illness, it is surely the greatest case of denial in the history of human existance.

This is what any arguement or debate IMO breaks down to with you. I am no longer going to try to talk to you, for it is pointless. But when I get in these situations I will just post this video clip of the degradation of an arguement, to save us all a lot of time and finger tip wear.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znowCx_y7nU

good day, sir.

Good day indeed,almost everybody except for Charlie had more sparring experience,and more legit experience,and definitly more training then he had.
He finally showed up for a fight,ready to fight,won the fight,and got hosed on the cards
Hey mule boy,your cart is waiting to be pulled.
Face it Sahib,before I got him Andrew just got thrown to the wolves,like he was a piece of meat.
You could celebrate the fact that somebody decided to change that,or you could act,exactly like you are.
Your momma must be proud that she didnt give you any morals