Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Should the fight have been called a no contest?

Results 1 to 15 of 178

Thread: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    861
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TeleTuff View Post
    There needs to be A re-match,plain and simple,I know that Warren would love to add A veterans name like Barrera`s t o the resume of his young charge,..But not this way,I dont give A FUK what anybody says this fight is tainted because of that cut,and the fight should have been stopped in the first round by the Ref. or the doctor PERIOD!,....It is the main job of the Ref to look-out for the welfare of the fighter`s,If Barrera had caught another butt there it would have split his scalp right down the middle,....

    The fact that the fight was allowed to go on to the fifth round,when Khan could be awarded the victory also tells me that something aint right.Personally I believe that the young Khan would beat Barrera maybe even worse in A seconfd fight.,.... At this point,Khan is too fast,too strong,too big and young for Barrera,and I agree with Warren that if Khan is what they believe,and have hyped him to be,....Well,he should be able to beat Barrera.,,,,But,...If you call yourself A Boxing fan you must know that Boxing is the most unpredictable of sports,and Barrera could have got dominated for 10 rds,then wind-up catching Khan in the 11th and KOing him,.....Or A Thousand other scenario`s?,......

    Khan`s young carear is off to A tumultious start,....A KO stoppage from out of nowhere,to basically A nobody,to slow down the hype train,and know what is clearly A tainted victory over A Legend in the twilight of his Boxing carear.

    BTW,Ilike Khan,last weekend was the first time I have seen him fight.Frankly,....cut aside I was impressed big time with this guy,Very strong at 135,....FUK!,...Really strong,fast too. I hope Warren does not over-protect this guy,he`s got real talent,and will make for some very exciteing fights in the future.
    Why is something aint right? It was up to Barerra to continue or not he could have said no and it would have been a NC. It wasnt like the commission delayed it, Barerra did.
    The Doctor or the Ref should have called it. It wasnt a nose bleed,it was blood gushing in to his eye,and they let it go exactly as long as it needed to go to make it a decision. Its not passing the sniff test.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1207
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tilt A Whirl View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TeleTuff View Post
    There needs to be A re-match,plain and simple,I know that Warren would love to add A veterans name like Barrera`s t o the resume of his young charge,..But not this way,I dont give A FUK what anybody says this fight is tainted because of that cut,and the fight should have been stopped in the first round by the Ref. or the doctor PERIOD!,....It is the main job of the Ref to look-out for the welfare of the fighter`s,If Barrera had caught another butt there it would have split his scalp right down the middle,....

    The fact that the fight was allowed to go on to the fifth round,when Khan could be awarded the victory also tells me that something aint right.Personally I believe that the young Khan would beat Barrera maybe even worse in A seconfd fight.,.... At this point,Khan is too fast,too strong,too big and young for Barrera,and I agree with Warren that if Khan is what they believe,and have hyped him to be,....Well,he should be able to beat Barrera.,,,,But,...If you call yourself A Boxing fan you must know that Boxing is the most unpredictable of sports,and Barrera could have got dominated for 10 rds,then wind-up catching Khan in the 11th and KOing him,.....Or A Thousand other scenario`s?,......

    Khan`s young carear is off to A tumultious start,....A KO stoppage from out of nowhere,to basically A nobody,to slow down the hype train,and know what is clearly A tainted victory over A Legend in the twilight of his Boxing carear.

    BTW,Ilike Khan,last weekend was the first time I have seen him fight.Frankly,....cut aside I was impressed big time with this guy,Very strong at 135,....FUK!,...Really strong,fast too. I hope Warren does not over-protect this guy,he`s got real talent,and will make for some very exciteing fights in the future.
    Why is something aint right? It was up to Barerra to continue or not he could have said no and it would have been a NC. It wasnt like the commission delayed it, Barerra did.
    The Doctor or the Ref should have called it. It wasnt a nose bleed,it was blood gushing in to his eye,and they let it go exactly as long as it needed to go to make it a decision. Its not passing the sniff test.
    Barerra wanted to continue other then the fact he was a warrior he obviously must have felt the fight was within his grasp or that he'd win.

    Thats why i said i dont understand why he said after the fight he thought they should have stopped it sooner when he was the one who elected to continue.

    If the fighter says he is fine in terms of where a cut is the ringside physician can take it as just that especially with someone as experienced as Barerra. It was Barerra's choice to continue the fight. Then after the fight he probably said what he said so that he'd get a rematch.
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tilt A Whirl View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post

    Why is something aint right? It was up to Barerra to continue or not he could have said no and it would have been a NC. It wasnt like the commission delayed it, Barerra did.
    The Doctor or the Ref should have called it. It wasnt a nose bleed,it was blood gushing in to his eye,and they let it go exactly as long as it needed to go to make it a decision. Its not passing the sniff test.
    Barerra wanted to continue other then the fact he was a warrior he obviously must have felt the fight was within his grasp or that he'd win.

    Thats why i said i dont understand why he said after the fight he thought they should have stopped it sooner when he was the one who elected to continue.

    If the fighter says he is fine in terms of where a cut is the ringside physician can take it as just that especially with someone as experienced as Barerra. It was Barerra's choice to continue the fight. Then after the fight he probably said what he said so that he'd get a rematch.
    Why do you keep saying it was Barreras decision? No it wasn't you can ask him and 99% of fighters if they want to box on and they'll all say yes. I've seen guys knocked down who clearly have had enough look over beggingly to their corners hoping they'll stop it before the ref has to step in or they slump to the floor again.

    I don't think he'd want to fight here again after that stink fest do you?

    You mention that, everyone was wondering what would happen when Barrera hit him on the chin. We all saw he wobbled and not just the once. Which is why it makes it all the more the crappy decision. The smaller, slower, can't hit at this weight Barrera was able to connect and it had an effect. If he'd hit him and nothing happened I may but it's an outside 'may' have contemplated the fact that Barrera had little chance. But that wasn't the case now was it?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    861
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    They stopped Klitschko when he was winning for a cut that wasnt even bleeding in to his eye but around it,Barrera was fighting with one eye tied behind his back in there

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tilt A Whirl View Post
    They stopped Klitschko when he was winning for a cut that wasnt even bleeding in to his eye but around it,Barrera was fighting with one eye tied behind his back in there

    it's mad but I like it

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    1,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    It was up to the doctor. MAB could also be unsure that if HE decided to quit rather than the doctor it would be a TKO loss rather than a NC.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    253
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bomp View Post
    It was up to the doctor. MAB could also be unsure that if HE decided to quit rather than the doctor it would be a TKO loss rather than a NC.
    I second that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1814
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Can we not talk about Roy Jones or Bernard Dunne getting beaten up this weekend now?
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Can we not talk about Roy Jones or Bernard Dunne getting beaten up this weekend now?
    Dunnes getting sparked. Thats a good bet.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1963
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Can we not talk about Roy Jones or Bernard Dunne getting beaten up this weekend now?
    Hatton/Pac blah blah blah

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Vitali need about a hundred stiches. If they didn't stop it he'd have no boat left.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    861
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Vitali need about a hundred stiches. If they didn't stop it he'd have no boat left.
    But the blood wasnt going in to his eye,it was for Barrera,and for the record Klitschko had 60 stitches

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tilt A Whirl View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Vitali need about a hundred stiches. If they didn't stop it he'd have no boat left.
    But the blood wasnt going in to his eye,it was for Barrera,and for the record Klitschko had 60 stitches
    60 is close to 100. Sort of.

    Barrera just needed a good cut-man. Trust me.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Barrera-Khan Fight Photos
    By :::PSL::: in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-18-2009, 02:08 PM
  2. What are betting odds on Barrera/Khan fight?
    By Jody Lane in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-15-2009, 01:29 AM
  3. Khan Barrera fight time
    By Mark TKO in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 10:12 PM
  4. Khan v Barrera may become a title fight
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 02-17-2009, 06:52 PM
  5. Khan to contest Commonwealth crown
    By Preme in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-2007, 05:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing