Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Pac-Hatton: Should be good fight, but "lose-lose" for me

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2431
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Hatton: Should be good fight, but "lose-lose" for me

    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    It's absurd that Hatton himself keeps touting this as for "the PFP championship"...whatever that is anyway....

    It's a big fight and he should leave it at that. He was saying it again in that Smitty interview and TBH I wish he would stop it. It only encourages other people who know nothing about boxing to start spouting the same. "Oh, Hatton beat Manny who was No 1 so Hatton must be number 1 now!". Reality check.....NO, IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT!! Now if Hatton can beat Marquez after then he might have a claim, but otherwise, no. If he beats Manny he can go up to number five for me. But it needs a further big win to take him higher.

    I think it's important that Hatton wins this fight as I think the future of the human civilisation depends upon it. A Manny Pac win could have catastrophic consequences and doesn't bear thinking about.

    too right

    1 win does not assend you straight to the very top of the pile, 4-5 however will do.

    If pac loses he isnt the p4p best fighter, if hatton wins nor is he!!
    By that Rationale you would promote somebody else to number 1 without them having had to fight

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1348
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Hatton: Should be good fight, but "lose-lose" for me

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    It's absurd that Hatton himself keeps touting this as for "the PFP championship"...whatever that is anyway....

    It's a big fight and he should leave it at that. He was saying it again in that Smitty interview and TBH I wish he would stop it. It only encourages other people who know nothing about boxing to start spouting the same. "Oh, Hatton beat Manny who was No 1 so Hatton must be number 1 now!". Reality check.....NO, IT DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT!! Now if Hatton can beat Marquez after then he might have a claim, but otherwise, no. If he beats Manny he can go up to number five for me. But it needs a further big win to take him higher.

    I think it's important that Hatton wins this fight as I think the future of the human civilisation depends upon it. A Manny Pac win could have catastrophic consequences and doesn't bear thinking about.

    too right

    1 win does not assend you straight to the very top of the pile, 4-5 however will do.

    If pac loses he isnt the p4p best fighter, if hatton wins nor is he!!
    By that Rationale you would promote somebody else to number 1 without them having had to fight
    it's simple, Marquez moves up to #1 if PAC loses, it's not like Manny has a strangle hold on the #1 spot, many are arguing that JMM should be #1 now anyways, a loss to Hatton would only further prove that, so IMO if Hatton wins he moves up to about 5, Pac drops down to either 2 or 3, and Marquez gets the #1 spot

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,736
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1240
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Hatton: Should be good fight, but "lose-lose" for me

    On May 2nd..... can't they knock each other out?
    Hahahahahaha!
    Pac loosing by decision will have hardcore PacFanBoys saying that Pac should have won blah blah blah.
    So I want to see Pac loose flat on his back. After that, I'll be rooting for Pac all the way vs Mayweather, Cotto, etc. Unless he fights a Mexican .

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Hatton: Should be good fight, but "lose-lose" for me

    If Pac loses, JMM will be the #1 by default and not Hatton.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2431
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Hatton: Should be good fight, but "lose-lose" for me

    I don't think Hatton goes to number 1 if he wins, but if you think Pac is number 1 now, how can you promote JMM to number 1 if Pac loses, when JMM hasn't fought to do anything to improve his own position? It doesn't make sense!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-31-2008, 03:30 PM
  2. Nate Campbell: "I'm going to show him how to lose"
    By undisputed in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-08-2008, 12:51 PM
  3. B-Hop: "I'll never lose to a WHITEBOY".......
    By DAVIDTUA in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 04-17-2008, 12:05 PM
  4. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-04-2006, 02:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing