Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Opinions on fights that confuse you

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In a room next to the airing cupboard
    Posts
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    857
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Not even so much official decisions that you see as bad, everybody's got to have some contrarian opinions on certain fights, these are, among others, mine.

    Mosley-De La Hoya II- I actually agreed with the decision but I could see how people might think Oscar won, its this insistence by some that he was robbed that confuses me. He at best won a close decision. Shane was clearly landing the harder punches and Oscar, as usual, got too much credit for flurries that didn't really land

    Bernard Hopkins-Jermain Taylor II- I think Hopkins clearly won this fight.
    A lot of people seem not to. The first fight is more debatable, Bernard clearly waited too long although its not like Taylor was doing much. But the second fight is almost to the point of not even being debatable to me, Bernard clearly won a majority of the rounds.

    JMM-Barrera-I've been a fan of Barrera's for a long long time but he clearly lost this fight IMO. If I remember correctly I wasn't really able to post on Saddo's around this fight so I remember being shocked by how close people thought it was or that some people thought he won. I just don't see it.

    Anyway, thoughts?
    I aggree with you there Ouma fan no way on earth Barrera won that fight he fought in effective spurts but Morrales was throwing and landing hard shots all night from 1 to 12 , think the difference is when MAB was hurt he tendedto kida tuck up and then rally whereas Morrales being upright got his head snapped back , but i mos def aggree with you on that .
    I watch fights with the sound of and it makes a hell of a difference , alot of the time the crowd sways the commentator and they without realising find theselves being overly dramtic when one fighter lands .

    Case in point Naz - MAB was alot closer , Naz towards the end of the fight was dominaiting with the Jab but found himself getting tagged off balance with alot of cuffing shots , Mab won the fight but it was by no means a landslide.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4363
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    PBF - Hatton: I cannot understand people who constantly assert that Hatton would've won if there was a different ref or if the fight had taken place at 140. Hatton loses to PBF every time, regardless of the ref or the weight class.

    Bute - Andrade: People who say Andrade was robbed based on the last round. Anyone who would actually take the time to read the IBF's championship rule would understand that this was not the case. Was Marlon Wright biased? Absolutely, he did a terrible job throughout the fight, letting Bute get away with everything. Should there be a rematch based on that alone? Certainly. However, regarding the final round, the seconds Bute's gloves cleared the canvas in the final round, the fight ended. Therefor, it does not matter if he was able to continue. The long count is also immaterial as Bute clearly is up by a regular count of 10.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    I thought Osacr clearly beat Mosley the 2nd time. I was shocked at the decision. I think even Mosley was shocked at the decision because that was a celebration that wreaked of surprise when his name was announced a winner.

    With JMM- Barrera, I thought JMM won clearly but I was pissed at the way Nady dealt with the knockdown. Because he didn't call it a knockdown and was slow to react, I felt that being deducted a point and not having the knockdown scored changed the complection of how Barrera fought the rest of the fight. He fought as a man who already felt robbed. For me it ruined the fight, but I'm a Marquez fan and I hate Barrera so in the end I don't care.

    B-Hop-Taylor II is debatable. I remember thinking it was close and I had Nard winning. I wouldn't have argued either way though, alot of close rounds.


    I couldn't understand how people felt Taylor beat Cory Spinks. I understand Spinks was negative and running and would have made a god awful middleweight champion, but Taylor didn't throw punches, and when you're not throwing, I can't score the fight your way. Honestly don't get it, but it set up a great Pavlik-Taylor fight, so I guess it was for the greater good.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Mayorga/ Spinks! I thought Mayorga won.

    Hopkins/ Wright, I thought Hopkins dominated down the stretch & won clearly.

    Jones Jr/ Tarver 1, thought Jones won by a couple of rounds.

    I thought Hopkins won the 2nd Taylor fight.

    I thought JMM clearly defeated barrera.

    Morales over Barrera in the 1st was crazy, but the same could be said of Barrera in the 2nd.

    I also thought that DLH won a close fight in the Mosley rematch.
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    I thought both Lewis-Holyfield fights were scored wrong #1 was Lewis all day #2 was Evander....I'm sorry he got jobbed in that fight, just as bad as Lennox did in the first fight. But why no rubber match?!?!?!

    I think Rocky Juarez lost vs Zahir Raheem and he was waaaay down on my card vs Barrios who's corner (amazingly) knew the drill with Juarez when he fights in Houston, only Jorge punched himself out.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    ODH beat Mosely second time

    MAB won the first fight against EM, but lost the second and third in my opinion.

    McCallum beat Toney the first two fights

    BHop beat Taylor the first time and drew the second time
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,575
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1224
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    I thought both Lewis-Holyfield fights were scored wrong #1 was Lewis all day #2 was Evander....I'm sorry he got jobbed in that fight, just as bad as Lennox did in the first fight. But why no rubber match?!?!?!

    I think Rocky Juarez lost vs Zahir Raheem and he was waaaay down on my card vs Barrios who's corner (amazingly) knew the drill with Juarez when he fights in Houston, only Jorge punched himself out.
    Yeah in retrospect I wish that Lewis had one the first fight. You knew Evander was going to have to knock him out and that there was no way he was going to get a decision in the 2nd. I thought he won it as well. It is just sad that b/c the first decision was so bogus that the second one gets no attention.
    Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2811
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    I thought both Lewis-Holyfield fights were scored wrong #1 was Lewis all day #2 was Evander....I'm sorry he got jobbed in that fight, just as bad as Lennox did in the first fight. But why no rubber match?!?!?!

    I think Rocky Juarez lost vs Zahir Raheem and he was waaaay down on my card vs Barrios who's corner (amazingly) knew the drill with Juarez when he fights in Houston, only Jorge punched himself out.
    Yeah on Lewis Holyfield I. It was not even close. Totally bizarre that one. II I thought was very close, maybe a slight edge to Holy, but it was nowhere near as bad as I.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Jones Jr/ Tarver 1, thought Jones won by a couple of rounds.
    .
    Me too! When I finally got round to watching that fight after all the talk of Tarver getting robbed, I just didn't see it.

    Jones was far more effective in my eyes. Tarvers little flurries didn't do much but make the crowd a little noisier.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Jones Jr/ Tarver 1, thought Jones won by a couple of rounds.
    .
    Me too! When I finally got round to watching that fight after all the talk of Tarver getting robbed, I just didn't see it.

    Jones was far more effective in my eyes. Tarvers little flurries didn't do much but make the crowd a little noisier.
    Jones' body shots were menacing!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Some great ones there Thirdman! That Navarro scorecard still has me scratching my head.

    The recent Martinez/ Cintron fight still has me confused! Martinez should have won twice, the KO & then on the cards but only managed a draw
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    I am always confused with the goings on in boxing.

    DLH V Trinidad still has me puzzled, a clear winner DLH loses on decision and having viewed the fight many times still cannot give Tito any rounds from 2-9? Round 1 was anyone's guess. I gave it to DLH anyway and scored the fight 117-111

    DLH V Mosley 2 again was a great effort by DLH not rewarded, he lost the first fight by a MD yet Mosley clearly won that fight, he loses the second fight by UD in which he clearly beats Mosley?? WTF?

    There are many others, Steele stops the Taylor V Chavez fight with 3 seconds to go?

    The Whitaker draw with Chavez? Why no rematch? Whitaker clearly won that fight.

    Duran...No Mas? did he really have the s hits?

    Navarro scorecard 120-108 v Cristian Mijares WTF happened there?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Crawley, West Sussex
    Posts
    4,253
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1192
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    There are many others, Steele stops the Taylor V Chavez fight with 3 seconds to go?
    Because Taylor was gone, he had swallowed a pint and a half of his own blood (according to his own trainer, Lou Duva) and had a broken eye orbital.

    Sure he could of won, even if he had taken another Chavez right hand, but Steele's sole responsibility is that of protecting the fighters, he is not the timekeeper, and he made his (right) call.

    Duran...No Mas? did he really have the s hits?
    My theory is that Duran was not properly focused and was simply fustrated with Leonard's tactics and justified walking away because in his opinion; Leonard was not fighting.

    I suspect soon after the bout, Duran realized his error and tried to dig himself out of the hole he had created....
    Last edited by Britkid; 04-30-2009 at 06:51 AM.
    "Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."

    George Foreman

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Levittown PA
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1388
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Here are a few that always confuse and sometimes aggravate me.

    Ali - Frazier II
    Ali - Norton III
    Foreman - Schultz
    Foreman - Briggs
    Not on the same level but Burton vs Augustus
    Dale Brown - Oneill Bell
    Holyfield - Valuev
    De La Hoya - Trinidad as well as Mosley II
    Hagler - Leonard

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1142
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Opinions on fights that confuse you

    Quote Originally Posted by The Fightfan View Post
    Here are a few that always confuse and sometimes aggravate me.

    Ali - Frazier II
    Ali - Norton III
    Foreman - Schultz
    Foreman - Briggs
    Not on the same level but Burton vs Augustus
    Dale Brown - Oneill Bell
    Holyfield - Valuev
    De La Hoya - Trinidad as well as Mosley II
    Hagler - Leonard
    I didn't give Foreman a round in the Schultz fight. That was awful. But Schultz did get another shot at a title so it was no foul there. Saw Valuev-Holyfield on youtube. Thought Holy clearly outboxed the giant. De La Hoya versus Trinidad was pure stupidity on Oscars part the way he ran the last three rounds.
    Formerly LuciferTheGreat

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Nationalism in opinions on fighters and fights
    By Onix in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 07-25-2008, 09:39 PM
  2. Why do people confuse exposure with hype?
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-18-2007, 12:18 AM
  3. Women confuse me...
    By AdamGB in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-29-2007, 08:35 PM
  4. Help, Im Confuse
    By shadow-boxer in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-19-2006, 08:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing