Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post

Lineal at 112 seems to work out. Even if people think Johnson was a better champion you can trace "the man who beat the man" to Pac. (It should be noted he LOST that title before moving up. )

Lineal at 130 seems a bit bogus. There is no "man who beat the man" or unified champion. Barrera had the WBC and recently vacted the IBF when Marquez beat him. That's two titles for Marquez and subsequently two for Pac. BUT Guzman was WBO champion and Valero WBA champion at the time. There are no form lines (i can find) that tie the titles to Pac or Marquez. So The Ring title was on the line for Marquez-Pac but not the linear title.

Pac is a 3 time linear champ. Someone correct me if wrong.

Forecast: UNclear, Lineal Claim to the World Title

It's up for debate and as what the writer pointed out, the gap between PAC and JMM and the rest at 130 is so noticeable... Guzman? Valero? I think they're a notch below PAC and JMM...

BTW, who are the other boxers with 3 lineal titles aside from PAC?
.
Don't know, tell me?
I also don't know... It's possible PAC the only boxer with 3 lineal titles... Yahoooo