The Mayweather double standard.

[JonesJrMayweather]

not to mention many believe that Morales won the second fight, which was the most TECHNICAL fight of the 3
first off don't call me little boy cause unlike you i'm no kid, it's no jibberish because even a flash knockdown would have done it, don't kid yourself thinking that Manny was anywhere close in stopping JMM, the thing you don't understand is that Pacquiao ONLY won due to the knockdown, cause if it weren't for that, there is NO way anyone would have been able to have him ahead of JMM


well then going by your way of thinking, Jones Jr must of been pretty one dimensional as well, cause the first time he stepped in the ring against a hard hitting fast southpaw in Tarver he barely got a MD, then got KTFO in 2, with only one shot, brutally KO'd in his next fight against Johnson, and then barely managed to make it out of the 11th to lose by UD against Tarver funny how that "logic" works out

That's your logic not mine, dude i think you should have someone read aloud to you, because it seems that you're processing the information wrong...you used erik's one victory over pacman as leverage to him being better than JMM and MAB, and the fact that he was able to slug with pacquiao instead of box. It's your logic that he's not one dimensional based off what he did against an underschooled pacman, once roach was able to get manny to wait and counter a little bit, morrales was done. An d they learned that after watching raheem beat the hell out of him, only difference was Zahir didnt hit as hard as Manny.

Now just to entertain the silly comments about roy...only an idiot would argue that jones was one dimensional.

BTW don't take it personal, im sure erik morales doesn't pay you to be his internet guardian

where the hell did i use it as leverage, learn to read buddy i said that Morales' win over Pacquiao was probably more due to Pacquiao's lack of technical ability at the time, because Morales pretty much showed he was shot in his very next fight, not taking it personal at all, just saying that Morales is one dimensional is incredibly narrowminded, and no i don't think that Jones is one dimensional by any means, but using the same logic THAT YOU USED, of how the first time Morales faced a "slick" fighter, he lost by a lopsided margin, the same can be said about Jones Jr, cause well you know very well how he's been as of since the Tarver KO, both fighters (Morales & Jones) lost so many fights (and badly at that) back to back, due to weight problems and decline in ability

as for you last comment, you're one to talk, this is from the dude who thought Taylor was the future of boxing at one point...

Taylor? I think you have me confused with someone else...never backed jermain taylor as the future of the sport...cant remeber even picking taylor for any fight now that i think of it..

and i do apologize for reading too fast, that comment about logic was to the guy that said "uh but erik is the only one to beat pacman out of JMM and MAB"...

[ElTerribleMorales]

That's your logic not mine, dude i think you should have someone read aloud to you, because it seems that you're processing the information wrong...you used erik's one victory over pacman as leverage to him being better than JMM and MAB, and the fact that he was able to slug with pacquiao instead of box. It's your logic that he's not one dimensional based off what he did against an underschooled pacman, once roach was able to get manny to wait and counter a little bit, morrales was done. An d they learned that after watching raheem beat the hell out of him, only difference was Zahir didnt hit as hard as Manny.

Now just to entertain the silly comments about roy...only an idiot would argue that jones was one dimensional.

BTW don't take it personal, im sure erik morales doesn't pay you to be his internet guardian

where the hell did i use it as leverage, learn to read buddy i said that Morales' win over Pacquiao was probably more due to Pacquiao's lack of technical ability at the time, because Morales pretty much showed he was shot in his very next fight, not taking it personal at all, just saying that Morales is one dimensional is incredibly narrowminded, and no i don't think that Jones is one dimensional by any means, but using the same logic THAT YOU USED, of how the first time Morales faced a "slick" fighter, he lost by a lopsided margin, the same can be said about Jones Jr, cause well you know very well how he's been as of since the Tarver KO, both fighters (Morales & Jones) lost so many fights (and badly at that) back to back, due to weight problems and decline in ability

as for you last comment, you're one to talk, this is from the dude who thought Taylor was the future of boxing at one point...

Taylor? I think you have me confused with someone else...never backed jermain taylor as the future of the sport...cant remeber even picking taylor for any fight now that i think of it..

and i do apologize for reading too fast, that comment about logic was to the guy that said "uh but erik is the only one to beat pacman out of JMM and MAB"...

no prob, honestly though back to the subject at hand, i think people are reading way too damn much into the whole p4p #1 thing, it's really starting to get ridiculous