Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Wards Rank at 168

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Wards rating at 168?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2895
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wards rating at 168?

    I think Rozzy has it right though you could probably shuffle that bottom order around. I think Ward slips into the middle and if he's serious he will climb to the top because he and Dirrell are better then anyone on the bottom half of that list.

    It's a bit unfair to have Andrade over Froch too. But that is the right top `0 and with the win Ward goes to the mid-bottom of the top 10. Also, how long is Kessler allowed to sit? He hasn't had a relevant win in over 2 years and haas nothing scheduled.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wards rating at 168?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    I think Rozzy has it right though you could probably shuffle that bottom order around. I think Ward slips into the middle and if he's serious he will climb to the top because he and Dirrell are better then anyone on the bottom half of that list.

    It's a bit unfair to have Andrade over Froch too. But that is the right top `0 and with the win Ward goes to the mid-bottom of the top 10. Also, how long is Kessler allowed to sit? He hasn't had a relevant win in over 2 years and haas nothing scheduled.
    I rate Froch and Andrade about equal. Andrade came within seconds of KOing Bute, who I rate higher than Taylor, but Froch managed to put away Taylor. Also, I credit Andrade for his overall better competition and decisive wins over Mack, Steiglitz, and Tsypko. I think Andrade would do the same thing to Taylor that Froch did to him, minus getting knocked on his ass.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1304
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wards rating at 168?

    A logical fight for Ward is Bika. Bika has a belt and has a recognizable name. He has been in with Bute, Calzaghe, and Soliman. I doubt Ward will get a fight with Froch because Froch is searching for bigger money fights and has already been in contact with Bute. Bute has the Andrade rematch with Froch. Andrade same.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1304
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wards rating at 168?

    Why is Balszay so high on your list? Has he fought anyone other than Inkin?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1441
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wards rating at 168?

    this thread is sooooo retarded...

    if the options were...

    A - 1-3
    B- 4-6
    C-7-10
    D- Higher

    this thread would be a tad bit interesting.

    but 1,2 or 3 for a man who isnt even a world champ is just pure retarded!!
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wards rating at 168?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Why is Balszay so high on your list? Has he fought anyone other than Inkin?
    You can flip flop Balszay and Taylor, but looking at the records of fighters below Balszay, do any of them (except Taylor at 160) have a win better than Inkin? He's a belt holder and he beat an undefeated belt holder. That's more than Green, Ward, Bika, or Dirrell has done.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Arreola's rating
    By terrorsid in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-14-2009, 08:30 PM
  2. How About Rating Tysons Era ??
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 09:15 PM
  3. Rating Question
    By BoxingGorilla in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-22-2006, 07:02 PM
  4. Profile rating
    By cringer in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-18-2006, 10:44 PM
  5. Rating?
    By ringside in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-19-2006, 01:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing