No he wasn't he had weight problems and took Lloyd Honeyghan too lightly, it was no different to Mike Tyson vs Buster Douglas. Yet you yourself will say that wasn't Mike Tyson in his prime so whats the difference ?
There is no difference except Mike Tyson had a very short Amateur career, where as Donald Curry had 404 Amateur fights. Which was the reason IMO he went stale quickly in the pros.
If you've seen Donald Curry land one of the best left hooks against Milton McCrory, or destroy fighters like Nino La Rocca or outhustle Marlon Starling in there 2nd fight. Its easy to tell Donald Curry was a shell of himself against Lloyd Honeyghan.
PS - The Tyson that fought Douglas was a drug ravished maniac![]()
Well i wasn't around in that era but i heard, Donald Curry was seriously weight drained in the Lloyd Honeyghan fight. Whatever it was he wasn't anywhere as good as he was in previous fights.
But after the Lloyd Honeyghan fight it all went down hill, but funny enough now you bring up the Mike McCallum fight. I thought Donald Curry looked better against Mike McCallum than he did against Lloyd Honeyghan.
I thought he was beating Mike McCallum and it looked like for a few rounds, that maybe he was finding his old form again. But that left hook was brutal and scary from Mike McCallum.
Curry once said he didn't like boxing, never wanted to turn pro after the ams, but the lure of the money/riches trapped him.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
You said he allowed himself to balloon up and lose a lot of weight for the fight and took Lloyd too lightly. That would make him a very stupid fighter. And Don wasn't. I think it was just a styles that make the fight issue and that Lloyd would have beat him any day of the week. He just had a style that was set to beat Don.
Formerly LuciferTheGreat
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks